'There can be no true coresponsibility in the Church without fully honouring the inherent dignity of women.'

There Can be no True Coresponsibility in thE Church Without fully Honouring the Inherent dignity of women

North American Final Document for the Continental Stage of the 2021-2024 Synod

The North American Final Document for the Continental Stage of the 2021-2024 Synod was released on April 12, 2023.

This document is a synthesis of the synod reports from the U.S. and Canada and the fruits of discernment from the synod writing team.

The document places a significant emphasis on a desire for greater co-responsibility:

“We need to ground ourselves in the equal dignity of baptism. This is an entry point for co-responsibility.”

It goes on to say: "There can be no true co-responsibility in the church without fully honoring the inherent dignity of women" (paragraph 19).

The paragraph on women continues: "The continental delegates recognized the crucial work women do to keep the church 'alive and healthy.' Nonetheless, delegates also named women as a marginalized group in the church."

"While clarity is still needed around exactly what a fully co-responsible church looks like, delegates proposed the examination of a variety of aspects of church life, including decision-making roles, leadership, and ordination."

While the need for sacramental equality is *crystal clear* to us, it is significant that Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishop (CCCB) and US Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) appointed delegates and bishops proposed greater discernment on the ordination of women.

A topic that for many decades Catholics have been told is off the table, is undeniably part of the global discernment of the church — at the highest levels. In the coming months, this document, along with the other Continental documents, will inform the instrumentum laboris — the working document guiding the synod gathering at the Vatican in October 2023 (where we know at least one woman will be voting!).

We know there is no turning back from this movement of the Holy Spirit. And we continue to commit to ensuring that the voices calling for sacramental equality will carry to the halls of the Vatican this fall, during the global stage of the synod, and beyond.

On the Death of George Pell: He Led A Church That Alienated Its Women: I Pray for Reform by Marilyn Hatton 13 January 2023

On the Death of George Pell: He Led A Church That Alienated Its Women: I Pray for Reform by Marilyn Hatton
The Sydney Morning Herald | 13 January 2023

Speaking as a woman and member of the Catholic faithful, I believe many will have mixed feelings about Cardinal George Pell’s death. Back in 2011, Pell presided over a model of church that was the antithesis of what many Catholics of faith, living in a modern democracy, found acceptable.

Child abuse within the church had broken trust. I was among progressive Catholics working desperately to reform a church that was clearly ignorant of the terrible harm its clerical culture had caused. Even when it amounted to criminal behaviour, the church was resistant to criticism of its lack of transparency and accountability and the failures of its leadership – all devastatingly exposed by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.

Pell, as we know, was imprisoned on charges of child abuse, but this conviction was quashed by Australia’s High Court. Many will mourn his death this week. He was a significant figure in Australian and international Catholicism. He was instrumental in rectifying financial corruption within the Vatican.

Pell led a church in Australia that subordinated and alienated its women – and continues to do so.

But Pell also led a church in Australia that subordinated and alienated its women – and continues to do so.

Women are the solid core of the Catholic Church and the Catholic faith. Our church, like others, is shedding followers. If the equality of Catholic women is denied, the church will continue to bleed.

It will have diminishing relevance to future generations. The world is rapidly becoming aware of how a patriarchal culture works destructively. When people of goodwill are confronted with it, they find it intolerable.

Rolling the camera forward to 2023, some 20 renewal groups under the umbrella of the Australasian Catholic Coalition for Church Reform – including bodies such as the Concerned Catholics Canberra/Goulburn (CCCG) and Women’s Wisdom in the Church (WWITCH) – are working for change. They ensured well-researched recommendations and decrees for change emerged from last year’s National Plenary Council.

A plenary council is the highest formal meeting of bishops and other representatives from all dioceses in the Catholic Church in Australia. It is prescribed under Canon law. Its purpose is to discern (listen and discuss) what God is asking of us at this time in Australia. Such a council was last held in Australia in 1939.

In all consultations, most mentioned was the issue of women’s equality and participation across all levels of ministry. This is not surprising. In all other walks of life in our democracy, women have risen to hold the highest positions of responsibility.

Not so in the monarchical Catholic Church, where women are excommunicated for presiding over Eucharist and must be ordained in secret. This is the model of church that Pell presided over, the model that Australian bishops – appointed by Pell – adhere to today.

And this is the model that Pope Francis is working to change. This pope is reluctant to ordain women. He has a traditional view of women’s role. Nevertheless, he is the most progressive, compassionate Pope I have seen in my lifetime.

Our church desperately needs to break the gender imbalance that nurtures its destructive clerical culture. In a world that benefits from people of faith, our church needs women in ministry.

Australia’s Plenary Council has consulted the laity. That said, it can be hard going. The laity and renewal groups submit proposals as requested, often at short notice, to the bishops’ consultative bodies. They can go back and forth with the result that what is finally submitted to Rome is sometimes hardly recognisable.

The latest Plenary Council ran for four years until last September, amid delays created by the pandemic, but it did make progress. It involved non-ordained members of the church, priests and bishops. Its agenda included Item 4.5, relating to the dignity and equality of women and men. It contained a simple clause suggesting the bishops support ordaining women to the deaconate, a first step to the ministry.

The deaconate is an order of ministry that lay women and men were ordained to in the early Catholic Church, following Christ’s time, in the 400s. This has attracted much scholarship and discussion, including in two Vatican commissions. So it wouldn’t really be a change, more a restoring of women to an existing order.

This simple item, at first vote, was passed by delegates who had advisory votes only. But it was not passed by a two-thirds majority of bishops, who carried the deliberative votes. That is, theirs were the only votes that counted.

the majority of bishops do want reform, but they need leadership to take that step. I fear they still do not comprehend what a destructive force gender imbalance remains in our church.

Some 60 people, including lay delegates, priests and two bishops, stood aside and asked the chair not to continue with the agenda until the motion was reworded. One of the bishops then led a process to this effect, and the reworded clause – taking into account the concerns of some bishops, but not changing the original intention – passed with the required two-thirds support of bishops.

This tells us the majority of bishops do want reform, but they need leadership to take that step. I fear they still do not comprehend what a destructive force gender imbalance remains in our church.

Pope Francis’s vision of a future Catholic Church must address women’s equality. In recent years, under his leadership, reform groups have been looking to a synodal model of church that is inclusive, transparent and accountable, one that brings Christ’s message of love and justice to the world.

The pope has called the 2023-24 Vatican Synod on Synodality, for October this year, a major event for the universal Catholic Church that will gather cardinals and bishops from around the world to focus on change. Reformers hope to influence it.

Our church desperately needs to break the gender imbalance that nurtures its destructive clerical culture. In a world that benefits from people of faith, our church needs women in ministry.

I respect what Pope Francis has achieved. Most recently, he appointed Sister Nathalie Becquart as one of the two undersecretaries of the Synod of Bishops. This makes Becquart, a significant church theologian, the most powerful woman in the Vatican. She will visit Australia and give public lectures in the Parramatta diocese on February 3.

Becquart says she has taken her inspiration from many Catholic women before her. I do, too. As a mother and grandmother, I look forward to a Catholic Church of humility, inclusion and compassion.

Marilyn Hatton is a lay woman and advocate for women’s equality in the Catholic Church. She has worked with several renewal groups over the past 20 years, both nationally and internationally.

Marilyn Hatton is lay woman and advocate for women’s equality in the Catholic Church. She has worked nationally and internationally with several renewal groups over the past 20 years. She generously served on WOW’s International Steering Committee and Leadership Circle as Delegate from Australia.

Pope Benedict and Women: An Unworthy Legacy by Professor Denise Couture

Pope Benedict and Women: An Unworthy Legacy
Professor Denise Couture | Le Devoir
13 January 2023

On December 31, 2022, the death of Pope Benedict XVI gave rise to numerous texts on the contribution of a man recognized by many as a great intellectual and a great theologian. But little mention has been made of one crucial element: his conception of the status of women. However, this has had a considerable impact on the anti-feminist policy of the Vatican for the past forty years.

The Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) opened the Roman Catholic Church to the world, however integrating into its decrees the conservative and progressive currents then in great tension. What would become of the Church after the council? Would it accept the principles of human rights, equality and non-discrimination within it? At the close of the council, these questions remained open.

Until the 1970s, the Catholic theology of the Holy See settled the question of the status of women in a few words. Their subordination was self-evident. This was social and also ecclesial, and it required no explanation.

After the Second Vatican Council and after the second feminist wave which took off in the same decade, the issue of the status of women became crucial for the leaders of the Vatican. Pope John Paul II (1978-2005) then set about the task of developing a theology of women which ran for several hundred pages. This political theology justifies the subordination of women to men, the absolute prohibition of contraception and abortion, and the exclusion of women from the priesthood, and therefore from governance in the Church, because they are women.

This political theology justifies the subordination of women to men, the absolute prohibition of contraception and abortion, and the exclusion of women from the priesthood, and therefore from governance in the Church, because they are women.

Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith from 1981 to 2005 and right arm of Pope John Paul II, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger actively participates in the construction of the contemporary patriarchal policy of the Vatican. Having become Pope Benedict XVI (2005-2013), he pursued it and consolidated it. His successor, Pope Francis, reiterates it to this day.

The man exposed his political theology on women and feminism in a dozen texts. Here are five significant statements.

First, Cardinal Ratzinger argued that woman is another 'I' in the order of humanity. ‘In its deepest and most original being, [she] exists 'for the other' (2004). He maintains that the principle of help is inscribed by God in the nature of woman as an immutable anthropological datum.

Then he believes that the specific characteristic of women is to give birth. It is his "psycho-physical" constitution which corresponds to the eternal will of God. Female identity is "linked to her physical capacity to give life" (2004).

On this point, Cardinal Ratzinger justified his view with these words: ‘the complementarity of the sexes’ is ‘an obvious truth’. One ‘cannot erase from the human mind [the] certainty’ of the existence of ‘two persons of different sexes’ (2003).

According to him, feminism is dangerous. First, feminism considers ‘differences between the sexes as cultural conditionings so that it denies their biological determinations’; then it breaks the harmony between men and women causing the woman to ‘set herself up as the rival of the man’ (2004). Feminism poses such a threat, writes Benedict XVI, that it signifies a ‘self-destruction of man [sic] and therefore a destruction of the work of God himself’ (2009, emphasis in text).

This is the current discourse and contemporary policy of Vatican leaders endorsed by Pope Francis.

Finally, in his view, women do not have access to priestly ordination, but this does not constitute discrimination, because for there to be one, the action would have to correspond to an unjust law. However, this is not the case with regard to the different roles exercised by men and women, since they are willed by God (2003).

A case that arouses indignation

This is the current discourse and contemporary policy of Vatican leaders endorsed by Pope Francis.

The contemporary Vatican patriarchy has a deleterious effect on Catholic women, but also on all women in the world. The Holy See has the status of an observer state at the UN, where it exercises a certain influence. Globally, it is heavily criticized by forces within the Catholic Church. You may consult on this subject the criticisms of Quebec feminist groups, such as Femmes et Ministères.org and L’autre Parole.

The Holy See is part of a set of current autocratic regimes, state or religious, which trample on the rights of women and keep them in the position of minors. The Vatican leadership deserves strong and explicit opposition from democratic states and human rights organizations.

From my point of view as a feminist analyst of religions, I wish to underline the diplomatic skill of the Vatican leaders, who got away with very little criticism from outside their organization about their policy of subordinating women.

The Holy See is part of a set of current autocratic regimes, state or religious, which trample on the rights of women and keep them in the position of minors. The Vatican leadership deserves strong and explicit opposition from democratic states and human rights organizations.

The legacy of Pope Benedict XVI regarding the status of women in society and in the Church is causing great outrage.

-Denise Couture is Full Professor (retired) at the Institute of Religious Studies, University of Montreal.

Le pape Benoît XVI et les femmes, un héritage indigne

Denise Couture is Full Professor (retired) at the Institute of Religious Studies, University of Montreal.

“Default Man” Standards by Sheila Peiffer

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres with Pope Francis

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres with Pope Francis

Christopher White  reports in the Brooklyn Tablet of March 11, 2020 that “United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres will receive the annual top prize from the Path to Peace Foundation – the major charitable organization established to support the work of the Holy See Mission to the U.N.”

This article briefly describes the qualifications of Guterres and how he and Pope Francis gave a joint presentation to the General Assembly last December. But the idea of the Holy See giving Guterres an award took me by surprise because I had just read the speech that Guterres gave recently at the New School in New York.  This talk, entitled “Women and Power,” was a stirring call for gender equality: “Today, as Secretary-General of the United Nations, I see one overwhelming injustice across the globe; an abuse that is crying out for attention. That is gender inequality and discrimination against women and girls.”

Guterres goes on to detail many examples of inequality and its deleterious effects on the world in various ways. “A hidden layer of inequality is built into the institutions and structures that govern all our lives – but are based on the needs of just half the population. The writer Caroline Criado Perez calls this “default man” thinking: the unquestioned assumption that men are standard, and women the exception.”  The Roman Catholic Church must be the largest, most entrenched “default man” institution in the world – where, literally, everything is designed for, decided by and measured by men.  Were the Apostolic Nuncio and the Path to Peace Foundation aware of this irony when they chose Guterres for this award?

“We cannot and we must not look the other way in the face of injustice, inequality, the scandal of hunger in the world, of poverty, of children who die because they lack water, food and necessary healthcare,” Pope Francis said in his joint video message with the Secretary General last December. Yet, the injustice and inequality that exists within the Church – which has enormous influence outside the Church – is being ignored.  Addressing hunger, poverty, and lack of healthcare are important issues that will take the collaboration of many forces in society to fix.  But the Pope could address the “injustice, inequality” within the Church if he so chose, if only he would not look the other way.

The award is being presented to Guterres in May. What will he say in his acceptance speech?  

_____________________________________________

Sheila Peifer is the President of the National Board of Directors of the USA’s Women’s Ordination Conference (WOC). WOC is a member group of WOW. Shiela is a cradle Catholic who has been married for more than 40 years to a Methodist man who in mid-life became a Methodist minister.

She writes about her work for women’s ordination: We have four children and early in their childhood, the local Catholic Church that I was attending found itself without a Director of Religious Education.  Through a series of (I now see) Holy Spirit inspired events, I began to run the program and went on to earn a Masters in Theology and enjoyed a long career in various pastoral positions.

Sheila Peiffer, President of National Board of Directors of Women’s Ordination Conference

Sheila Peiffer, President of National Board of Directors of Women’s Ordination Conference

As my awareness of Church issues increased, so too did my desire to work for change in its hierarchical structures and misogynistic attitudes and teachings.  By the time the clerical abuse scandal burst into the consciousness of the American church through the articles in the Boston Globe in 2002, I had already been on the fringes of several Catholic reform groups.  Reading of this latest travesty, I decided to start a Voice of the Faithful group on Long Island, where we lived.  The organization met with tremendous response, due to the gravity of the issue and the vehemence of the local Bishop’s opposition to me and Voice of the Faithful.

I have continued to stay active in reform, having served in many capacities in Voice of the Faithful, the American Catholic Council and, now, Women’s Ordination Conference, where I currently am President of the Board.  My continuing journey of discernment about Catholicism has led me to believe that the Church will never be able to claim authentic leadership until it recognizes full equality for women in all ministries.  As an organization with tremendous influence in every country in the world, the Church is complicit in the oppression of women as long as it does not address the root causes of exclusion within the Church and work to bring about a priestly ministry that includes women and is feminist, anti-racist, and accountable.

Jimmy Carter: Losing my religion for equality

Jimmy Carter: Losing My Religion for Equality

Women and girls have been discriminated against for too long in a twisted interpretation of the word of God.

Jimmy Carter

Jimmy Carter

I HAVE been a practicing Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention’s leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be “subservient” to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.

This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women’s equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices – as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy – and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: “The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.”

“The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable.”

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasize the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world’s major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place – and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence – than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn’t until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had – and still have – an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions – all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

Jimmy Carter and Global Elder was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981. This editorial originally appeared in The Age on April 27, 2017.
___________________________

jimmy carter a call to action.jpg


The world’s discrimination and violence against women and girls is the most serious, pervasive, and ignored violation of basic human rights: This is President Jimmy Carter’s call to action.

President Carter was encouraged to write the book A Call to Action by a wide coalition of leaders of all faiths. His urgent report covers a system of discrimination that extends to every nation. Women are deprived of equal opportunity in wealthier nations and “owned” by men in others, forced to suffer servitude, child marriage, and genital cutting. The most vulnerable, along with their children, are trapped in war and violence.

A Call to Action addresses the suffering inflicted upon women by a false interpretation of carefully selected religious texts and a growing tolerance of violence and warfare. Key verses are often omitted or quoted out of context by male religious leaders to exalt the status of men and exclude women. And in nations that accept or even glorify violence, this perceived inequality becomes the basis for abuse. President Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, have visited 145 countries, and The Carter Center has had active projects in more than half of them. Around the world, they have seen inequality rising rapidly with each passing decade. This is true in both rich and poor countries, and among the citizens within them.

Carter draws upon his own experiences and the testimony of courageous women from all regions and all major religions to demonstrate that women around the world, more than half of all human beings, are being denied equal rights. This is an informed and passionate charge about a devastating effect on economic prosperity and unconscionable human suffering. It affects us all.

The Samaritan Woman at the Well John 4: 1-42 - Sister Christine Vladimiroff

The Samaritan Woman at the Well
John 4: 1-42
by Sister Christine Vladimiroff
Source
: Written that You May Believe, Revised and Expanded: Encountering Jesus in the Fourth Gospel By Sandra M. Schneiders (especially Chapter 8).

Sister Christine Vladimiroff, OSB (January 12, 1940 – September 25, 2014)

Sister Christine Vladimiroff, OSB (January 12, 1940 – September 25, 2014)

From the Desert of Temptation, on the first Sunday of Lent we traveled to the Mount of Transfiguration. We made life-changing choices in the desert. God is to be the center of our lives. We will look to God for protection and for the bread of each day’s nourishment. We came out of the desert resolute to live into our calling as daughters and sons of God.

We stood on the mountain and saw God’s glory last Sunday. Yet another temptation—we wanted to stay there and to pitch our tents. Discipleship is more about going down the mountain to the suffering below than standing on the peak surveying the horizon. Our work is to bring God’s reign to the here and the now of our lives and to those with whom we share life at the foot of the mountain.

Today begins a trilogy of the stories that teaches us what it is to come to faith in Jesus. This Sunday we will sit at the well with the Samaritan woman and Jesus. We will speak of living water. Next Sunday it will be the man born blind and the themes of light and darkness and finally, the following Sunday, Martha mourns the death of Lazarus. The evangelist clearly teaches us through these narratives that the new life in Jesus is a life of hope and confidence, a life that brings with it a deep and abiding peace. The three stories present us with a locus of salvific encounter with God. In them we, too, can encounter God and come to believe, as persons and as Church, in Jesus.

Today’s gospel is very dense in meaning; it is highly symbolic; it conceals more than it reveals at times. We need to sit with it and read it at a deeper level to uncover the significance of the dialog between the Samaritan Woman and Jesus. Unfortunately, past exegesis that only dealt with the surface mislead us. Let us open it up in a fresh way as feminist biblical scholars lead us through the text.

My comments with cluster around three points:

  1. the self-revelation of Jesus to the woman;

  2. the woman’s role as witness; and

  3. the discomfort of the male disciples of Jesus with what occurred.

The Samaritan Woman at the Well is not simply a foil, feeding Jesus cue lines. She is a genuine theological dialogue partner gradually experiencing Jesus’ self-revelation even as she reveals herself to him. It is a revelation of Jesus astonishing an…

The Samaritan Woman at the Well is not simply a foil, feeding Jesus cue lines. She is a genuine theological dialogue partner gradually experiencing Jesus’ self-revelation even as she reveals herself to him. It is a revelation of Jesus astonishing and shocking inclusiveness. A model for the Christian worshiping community we call Church.

We know the author of this fourth gospel was reading back into the public ministry of Jesus the Johannine community’s post-resurrection experience of the Samaritan mission and the influence of the Samaritan converts within the community of the Fourth Gospel. The basic purpose of the story of the Samaritan Woman is to establish the full equality in the community between Samaritan Christians and Jewish Christians. It contains a powerful lesson for us today about inclusiveness in our Church and about the role of women as disciples and theologians.

We have a “type story,” a narrative that follows a recognized biblical pattern. The story recounts the meeting at a well. It is in the pattern of Abraham’s servant finding Rebekah, the future wife of Isaac at the well of Nahor; Jacob meeting Rachel at the well of Haran and Moses receiving Zipporah as wife at the well in Midian. All were persons who would play a role in salvation history. Jesus meets the woman in today’s gospel at the most famous well of all, Jacob’s well in Samaria. This scripture passage we read tonight is placed between the two Cana stories in John’s gospel. There is a marital theme to the conversation and the symbolism of fertility and fecundity. Some scholars say, Jesus is wooing Samaria.

This is a theological conversation. In it Jesus identifies himself with the lineage of the patriarchs giving, not a well from which to draw water, but living water. A spring that will give water and we will never thirst again. Next, Jesus makes a connection with Samaria’s past. In the theological context, it is not the woman who had five husbands. Historically, it was implausible for anyone in the Samaritan culture or the Jewish culture, to have five successive marriages. The conversation is symbolic and religious. The husbands refer to Samaria’s infidelity following the return of the remnants of the northern tribes from Assyrian captivity. They accepted the worship of the false gods of five foreign tribes. Jesus, the prophet, uses the familiar adultery/idolatry metaphor of the prophetic tradition to call Samaria to embrace the worship of the one God in spirit and truth.

Jesus identifies himself as prophet. Jesus reveals for the first time that God is spirit and neither the mount in Samaria nor the temple in Jerusalem is where the future is for those who worship in spirit and truth. More importantly, he reveals himself to be the messiah long awaited by both the Jews and the Samaritans. The Samaritan women said to Jesus: “ I know there is a messiah coming” and Jesus entrusts her with his reply—“I am he”.

The Samaritan woman …stands in stark contrast to Nicodemus. … [The] Samaritan woman comes to the well in full daylight. She engages in a careful theological scrutiny of Jesus. She questioned Jesus on virtually every significant tenet of Samaritan theology… This woman is a fully drawn person by the author of the gospel. She is not simply a foil, feeding Jesus cue lines. She is a genuine theological dialogue partner gradually experiencing Jesus’ self-revelation even as she reveals herself to him. It is a revelation of Jesus astonishing and shocking inclusiveness. A model for the Christian worshiping community we call Church.


The Samaritan woman in our gospel stands in stark contrast to Nicodemus. Nicodemus comes under the cover of darkness; quickly he disengages from the conversation with Jesus and finally slinks off into the night, confused. He did not come to believe in Jesus. Now our Samaritan woman comes to the well in full daylight. She engages in a careful theological scrutiny of Jesus. She questioned Jesus on virtually every significant tenet of Samaritan theology. In response we have Jesus’ self-identification as descendant of the patriarchs, prophetic Messiah and Mosaic “I am”. This woman is a fully drawn person by the author of the gospel. She is not simply a foil, feeding Jesus cue lines. She is a genuine theological dialogue partner gradually experiencing Jesus’ self-revelation even as she reveals herself to him. It is a revelation of Jesus astonishing and shocking inclusiveness. A model for the Christian worshiping community we call Church.

It is no secret that women portrayed in writings tend to be marginalized, reduced to sexuality, demonized and trivialized. It all happens with this text as with others in Scripture. We have heard the interpretation that our woman in the gospel was a loose woman and had to come to the well at noon when the other women were not around. We were told stories of her life of sin and, yes, her five husbands. Past interpretations simply come from a limited cultural blindness that overlay our categories on scripture. The heretofore exegesis of this text and others shows our inability to hold the truth of the change that is demanded in our thinking and the change that should take place in our lives if we accept Jesus. He shatters what has been acceptable and calls for something new.

It is no secret that women portrayed in writings tend to be marginalized, reduced to sexuality, demonized and trivialized. It all happens with this text as with others in Scripture. We have heard the interpretation that our woman in the gospel was a loose woman and had to come to the well at noon when the other women were not around. We were told stories of her life of sin and, yes, her five husbands. Past interpretations simply come from a limited cultural blindness that overlay our categories on scripture. The heretofore exegesis of this text and others shows our inability to hold the truth of the change that is demanded in our thinking and the change that should take place in our lives if we accept Jesus. He shatters what has been acceptable and calls for something new.

If we render women textually invisible in sacred writing and , we can then cite this as a factor in keeping them socially and ecclesially invisible. Our gospel today tells us that women existed in the early Church. They participated actively as apostles and were highly significant in Christian history from its first moments. The Samaritan woman left her water jar at the well; just as the other apostles left their fishing nets or tax stalls to announce the good news of Jesus to the village. She was on a par with them. All were converted in the village “because of the word of the woman who testified.” Jesus stayed there two days to teach them. A person who experienced exclusion, a woman, was sent to the “other”, the Samaritans, to invite them in to the community. The Samaritan woman was sent, as was Mary of Magdala, to tell others of Jesus.

If we render women textually invisible in sacred writing and , we can then cite this as a factor in keeping them socially and ecclesially invisible. Our gospel today tells us that women existed in the early Church. They participated actively as apostles and were… significant in Christian history from its first moments. The Samaritan woman left her water jar at the well; just as the other apostles left their fishing nets or tax stalls to announce the good news of Jesus to the village. She was on a par with them.


What past biblical exegesis did not see was not lost on the male disciples when they returned with the food for Jesus. It was profoundly unsettling to them to see Jesus talking with a woman in a public place. They who considered themselves privileged associates of Jesus did not accept a woman to be included in that inner circle. Jesus tells them that he has no need for the food they brought because his hunger had been satisfied by his dialogue with the woman. To their astonishment, the Samaritan mission, the preaching of Jesus and the invitation to believe, was in the hands of the woman. Jesus tells the men: “One sows and another reaps. I sent you to reap what you have not worked for; others have done the work.” The men would not initiate this mission nor was it under their control.

Jesus legitimates female participation in the Church’s mission. He does not see this announcing of God’s presence as a role that belongs to men, though appropriated by them organizationally. It is a kind of reverse psychology of exclusion that the apostles experience in tonight’s gospel.

Jesus legitimates female participation in the Church’s mission. He does not see this announcing of God’s presence as a role that belongs to men, though appropriated by them organizationally. It is a kind of reverse psychology of exclusion that the apostles experience in tonight’s gospel.


As is so often true, what is written in the gospels is a reflection of the struggle going on in the early church communities. One commentator believes that a woman evangelist wrote this narrative. Only a woman would be sensitive to the dynamic that took place and the reaction of the male disciples.. Also, a male author would not point out this weakness of fellow apostles that is apparent in this account and get away with it.

What does this have to do with me and with you as we continue our Lenten journey?

First, this passage projects what inclusion means and how to recognize the evil that undermines the reign of God. We cannot exclude others from our lives or from our love. Jesus reaches out to the Samaritans, not only enemies of the Jews, but former Jews who had been unfaithful to the covenant and who had fallen into idolatry. If our love is not universal it is not the love of Jesus that motivates. This universal love, however, must demonstrate itself in very particular and unique situations that touch our lives. Where in my life am I called to the ministry of inclusion? Can we show that Muslims, those of Middle Eastern descent, are included in our love? How do I live so as to authentically preach to the Church and society that no one is outside the scope of our love?

Secondly, as a woman I must claim my capacity to answer the call to discipleship. Jesus has not excluded me. Gender does not diminish the power of baptism in the Church of the Jesus who sat at the well with the woman. How can I move the Church to hear more clearly the message in of Jesus: In Christ there are neither Jew nor Gentile, neither free nor slave, neither male nor female—all are one in Christ.

As a woman I must claim my capacity to answer the call to discipleship. Jesus has not excluded me. Gender does not diminish the power of baptism in the Church of the Jesus who sat at the well with the woman. How can I move the Church to hear more clearly the message in of Jesus: In Christ there are neither Jew nor Gentile, neither free nor slave, neither male nor female—all are one in Christ.

Scripture texts function as a locus and mediator of transformative encounters with the living God. Lectio is engagement with God’s word. I must search to see myself in the stories of salvation with fresh eyes, not relying exclusively on old interpretations. I call myself to study and prayer. Feminist biblical scholars have opened new ways into the meaning of our spiritual journey, our place in the Church and the absolute necessity of our taking responsibility for speaking from our insights and competencies.

You have heard me use this definition before. Abraham Joshua Heschel wrote: “Repentance is an absolute, spiritual decision made in truthfulness. Its motivations are remorse for the past and responsibility for the future.”


I regret a past that has excluded others and my complicity with it. I will assume, with God’s grace, responsibility for a future that will look different. You and I are sent as was the Samaritan Woman and Mary of Magdala to preach Jesus.

Christine Vladimiroff, OSB, Prioress
Benedictine Sisters of Erie

Source: Written that You May Believe, Revised and Expanded: Encountering Jesus in the Fourth Gospel By Sandra M. Schneiders (especially Chapter 8)

- Sister Christine Vladimiroff, OSB (January 12, 1940 – September 25, 2014) was the prioress of the Benedictine Sisters of Erie from 1998 to 2010. As of 2004 she was also President of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, USA.

In 2001, when Benedictine Sister Joan Chittister made international news for refusing to obey a Vatican order forbidding her to speak at Women’s Ordination Worldwide Ordination of Women (WOW) international conference in Dublin, the Prioress of her monastery, Christine Vladimiroff made headlines along with her.  In the face of Vatican threats of "grave penalties," which could have ranged from excommunication to Chittister's expulsion from her monastery in Erie, Pennsylvania, Chittister attended the conference and spoke. Besides putting pressure on Chittister, the Vatican Congregation for Religious Life attempted to block Sister Joan's presentation by demanding that Vladimiroff issue the "precept of obedience" forbidding Chittister to speak, or face grave penalties herself. Vladimiroff refused. "I could not order something I was in total disagreement with, and that is silencing," shared Vladimiroff. Despite advanced age and infirmity, all but one of 128 active members of the Erie Benedictines co-signed Vladimiroff's letter to Rome. An additional letter of support came from nuns in twenty-two other Benedictine communities. The Vatican backed down.

A copy of Vladimiroff’s Statement about this is here. A copy of Joan Chittister’s address given at the conference is here: Keynote: Joan Chittister, osb: Discipleship for a Priestly People in a Priestless Period

A Factual Note of Encouragement: Changemakers Do Effect Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Some people criticize our work for women’s equality in the Church by insisting that the Church never changes and that it is therefore pointless to spend energy even hoping for change.

This perspective fails to account for the fact that our Church’s history shows many changes that have happened because of the persistence of those who work for justice. The change in Church teachings on slavery provides just one example. The following historical chart shows the evolution in Church teachings about slavery. At one time, the hierarchy condoned slavery. Not so today (though it was not until Vatican II that a conclusive, outright denunciation was made of it.)

Paying attention to this timeline will also help us remember that although at times it may seem like things are going backwards, it is often a few steps forward, then one or two back which in the end add up to slow but sure advance towards progress. If it is was this was for slavery, so it can also be for women.

362 AD
: The local Council at Gangra in Asia Minor excommunicates anyone encouraging a slave to despise his master or withdraw from his service. (Became part of Church Law from the 13th century).

354-430 AD: St. Augustine teaches that the institution of slavery derives from God and is beneficial to slaves and masters. (Quoted by many later Popes as proof of "Tradition".)

650 AD: Pope Martin I condemns people who teach slaves about freedom or who encourage them to escape.

1089 AD: The Synod of Melfi under Pope Urban II imposed slavery on the wives of priests. (Became part of Church Law from the 13th century).

1179 AD: The Third Lateran Council imposed slavery on those helping the Saracens.

1226 AD: The legitimacy of slavery is incorporated in the Corpus Iuris Canonici, promulgated by Pope Gregory IX which remained official law of the Church until 1913. Canon lawyers worked out four just titles for holding slaves: slaves captured in war, persons condemned to slavery for a crime; persons selling themselves into slavery, including a father selling his child; children of a mother who is a slave.

1224-1274 AD: St.Thomas Aquinas defends slavery as instituted by God in punishment for sin, and justified as being part of the ‘right of nations’ and natural law. Children of a slave mother are rightly slaves even though they have not committed personal sin! (Quoted by many later Popes).

1435 AD: Pope Eugenius IV condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of natives in the Canary Islands, but does not condemn slavery as such.

1454 AD: Through the bull Romanus Pontifex, Pope Nicholas V authorises the king of Portugal to enslave all the Saracen and pagan peoples his armies may conquer.

1493 AD: Pope Alexander VI authorises the King of Spain to enslave non-Christians of the Americas who are at war with Christian powers.

1537 AD: Pope Paul III condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of Indians in South America.

1548 AD: The same Pope Paul III confirms the right of clergy and laity to own slaves.

1639 AD: Pope Urban VIII denounces the indiscriminate enslavement of Indians in South America, without denying the four ‘just titles’ for owning slaves.

1741 AD: Pope Benedict XIV condemns the indiscriminate enslavement of natives in Brazil, but does not denounce slavery as such, nor the importation of slaves from Africa.

1839 AD: Pope Gregory XVI condemns the international negro slave trade, but does not question slavery as such, nor the domestic slave trade.

1866 AD: The Holy Office in an instruction signed by Pope Pius IX declares: Slavery itself, considered as such in its essential nature, is not at all contary to the natural and divine law, and there can be several just titles of slavery, and these are referred to by approved theologians and commentators of the sacred canons … It is not contrary to the natural and divine law for a slave to be sold, bought, exchanged or given".

1868: Josephine Bakhita is born in Sudan. (see panel right)

1877: At around the age of 9, Josephine is sold into slavery. She is sold and resold many times.

The turn around

1888 AD: Pope Leo III condemns slavery in more general terms, and supports the anti-slavery movement.

1918 AD: The new Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope Benedictus XV condemns ‘selling any person as a slave’. (There is no condemnation of ‘owning’ slaves, however).

1965 AD: The Second Vatican Council defends basic human rights and denounces all violations of human integrity, including slavery (Gaudium et Spes, no 27,29,67).

Today the Church works to end the scourge of human trafficking.

Shedding Light on Church Teachings

Some believe that the Catholic Church will not change its teachings because it fears giving the impression that a previous pope may have been in error. Bishop Raymond A. Lucker compiled a list of at least 65 teachings of the church that were once taught as authoritative teachings, but which have since been changed.

WOW member group, Wijngaards’ Institute for Catholic Church provides a comprehensive document about this on their website womenpriests.org.

For more, see here: Shedding Light on Church Teachings

Another helpful document is here: Teaching Authority and Errors in Presumed Doctrine

St. Josephine Bakhita

St. Josephine Bakhita

The feast of St. Josephine Bakhita is celebrated on February 8. She was born in Darfur, Sudan in 1869. At the age of 7 or 9 years old she was kidnapped, sold into slavery, and given the name Bakhita. After being sold several times and enduring such brutal treatment that she could no longer remember her true name, she ended up in Venice taking care of an Italian family’s child. When the family had to take care of some business back in Africa, they left Bakhita and their daughter with the Canossian Sisters of Charity. Bakhita would say later that the moment she walked through the Sister’s doors she felt she had returned home.

When the Italian family returned for Bakhita and their daughter, Bakhita refused to go with them. Despite the family’s protestations, it was determined that Bakhita was a free woman according to Italian law and they could not force her to accompany them. She was baptized Josephine in 1890 and became a Canossian Sister in 1896. After 50 years of ministry she died on February 8, 1947 at a Canossian Convent surrounded by her fellow Sisters.

In 2000, she was canonized by Pope John Paul II who declared: “The history of her life inspires not passive acceptance but the firm resolve to work effectively to free girls and women from oppression and violence and to return them to their dignity in the full exercise of their rights.” Her feast day is recognized as a day of prayer for an end to human trafficking around the world.

In the beginning of his second encyclical letter Spe Salvi (In Hope We Were Saved), Pope Benedict XVI relates her entire life story as an outstanding example of the virtue of hope.

May Josephine pray for our work that we may continue to move forward with firm resolve to work effectively to return women to their dignity in the full exercise of their baptismal equality in all sacraments of the Church.

________________________________

Pope Pius Ix

Pope Pius Ix

Pope Pius IX, while condoning slavery, condemned freedom of conscience, freedom of expression, freedom of worship and salvation outside the Church. In all these doctrines he has been proved wrong by the Second Vatican Council.

Photini, The Samaritan Woman at the Well and One of the First Active Apostles - by Therese Koturbash

On February 26, the Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Catholic Churches commemorate the Samaritan Woman. She is known in the Eastern tradition as Photini (the luminous one). Eastern Christians remember her as a Great Martyr and refer to her as Equal-to-the-Apostles. She stands today as one of the best patrons for women’s ordination.

Jesus&Samaitan_woman.jpg

My father is irritated every time he hears a priest preach that the Samaritan Woman or Photini was a sinful woman because she had 5 husbands. The sermon misses the point on her significance in scripture and fails to appreciate why a woman might have had more than one husband during that time (husband lost to war, illness, prison… without a man in the patriarchal society, a woman was nothing.) Not only is her story one that points to Jesus overcoming exclusiveness and move towards building a community of inclusiveness, scripture shows us a woman who preaches, teaches, evangelises and works as an Apostle.

Photini’s conversation with Jesus is the longest recorded in the New Testament.  It is significant. Icons depicting the conversation show the 12 male apostles looking on in dismay and dumbfounded as he stands alone with her in the broad light of day engaging in theological discussion…. theological discussion with a woman in which she holds her own! Her presence in the androcentric text that is scripture is significant:

Photini, the Samaritan Woman at the Well Talks with Jesus while the 12 male Apostles look observe with dismay that he is talking to a woman!

Photini, the Samaritan Woman at the Well Talks with Jesus while the 12 male Apostles look observe with dismay that he is talking to a woman!

  • in terms of Jesus engaging in deep theological discussion with her;

  • in illustrating how Jesus disregarded prevailing social mores with respect to interactions with women and those perceived to be outsiders:

  • with respect to her recognising him as the Saviour of the world;

  • as to how she is one of the people who best exemplifies apostleship;

  • as one of the first believers in Jesus and as a sign of how one's faith in Christ can develop;

  • as one of His first preachers;

  • in terms of her testimony to the people of her town.  Through a woman, the people of her town -- including men -- also came to believe.  This is noteworthy given that in her time, women were not accepted as credible witnesses.

Photini becomes one of the first active Apostles of Jesus…. and some say there were only 12 Apostles and that they were all men. She stands as one of the best patrons for women’s ordination.

Her story as told in EASTERN Christianity [1]:

She is a significant figure in the Johannine community. Like many other women, the Samaritan Woman contributed to the spread of Christianity. She therefore occupies a place of honour among the apostles. In Greek sermons from the fourth to the fourteenth centuries she is called "apostle" and "evangelist." In these sermons the Samaritan Woman is often compared to the male disciples and apostles and found to surpass them.

Later, Byzantine hagiographers developed the story of the Samaritan Woman, beginning where Saint John left off. At Pentecost Saint Photini received baptism, along with her five sisters, Anatole, Photo, Photis, Paraskeve, Kyriake, and her two sons, Photeinos and Joseph. She then began a missionary career, traveling far and wide, preaching the good news of the Messiah's coming, His death and resurrection. When Nero, the emperor of Rome, began to persecute Christians, Photini and her son Joseph were in Carthage, in Africa, where she was preaching the Christian gospel. After Jesus appeared to Photini in a dream, she sailed to Rome. Her son and many Christians from Africa accompanied her. Photini's arrival and activity aroused curiosity in the capital city. Everyone talked about her, "Who is this woman?" they asked. "She came here with a crowd of followers and she preaches Christ with great boldness."

Centre: The Samaritan Woman at the Well Talks with Jesus while the 12 male Apostles look on in dismay. Right: The Samaritan Woman teaches, preaches, evangelises and becomes one of the first active Apostles of Jesus.

Centre: The Samaritan Woman at the Well Talks with Jesus while the 12 male Apostles look on in dismay. Right: The Samaritan Woman teaches, preaches, evangelises and becomes one of the first active Apostles of Jesus.

Soldiers were ordered to bring her to the emperor, but Photini anticipated them. Before they could arrest her, Photini, with her son Joseph and her Christian friends, went to Nero. When the emperor saw them, he asked why they had come. Photini answered, "We have come to teach you to believe in Christ." The half-mad ruler of the Roman Empire did not frighten her. She wanted to convert him! Nero asked the saints their names. Again Photini answered. By name she introduced herself, her five sisters and younger son. The emperor then demanded to know whether they had all agreed to die for the Nazarene. Photini spoke for them. "Yes, for the love of Him we rejoice and in His name we'll gladly die." Hearing their defiant words, Nero ordered their hands beaten with iron rods for three hours. At the end of each hour another persecutor took up the beating. The saints, however, felt no pain. Nothing happened to their hands. Photini joyfully quoted words of a psalm by David: "God is my help. No matter what anyone does to me, I shall not be afraid." Perplexed by the Christian's endurance and confidence, Nero ordered the men thrown into jail. Photini and her five sisters were brought to the golden reception hall in the imperial palace. There, the six women were seated on golden thrones, In front of them stood a large golden table covered with gold coins, jewels and dresses. Nero hoped to tempt the women by this display of wealth and luxury. Nero then ordered his daughter Domnina, with her slave girls, to go speak with the Christian women. Women, he thought, would succeed in persuading their Christian sisters to deny their God.

Domnina greeted Photini graciously, mentioning the name of Christ. On hearing the princess' greeting, the saint thanked God. She then embraced and kissed Domnina. The women talked. But the outcome of the women's talk was not what Nero wished.

St Photini, The Samaritan Woman at the Well and her almost forgotten Apostolic family

St Photini, The Samaritan Woman at the Well and her almost forgotten Apostolic family

Photini catechized Domnina and her hundred slave girls and baptized them all. She gave the name Anthousa to Nero's daughter. After her baptism, Anthousa immediately ordered all the gold and jewels on the golden table distributed to the poor of Rome.

When the emperor heard that his own daughter had been converted to Christianity, he condemned Photini and all her companions to death by fire. For seven days the furnace burned, But when the door of the furnace was opened, it was seen that the fire had not harmed the saints. Next the emperor tried to destroy the saints with poison, Photini offered to be the first to drink it. “O King," she said, "I will drink the poison first so that you might see the power of my Christ and God." All the saints then drank the poison after her. None suffered any ill effects from it. In vain Nero subjected Photini, her sisters, sons and friends to every known torture. The saints survived unscathed to taunt and ridicule their persecutor. For three years they were held in a Roman prison. Saint Photini transformed it into a "house of God." Many Romans came to the prison, were converted and baptized. Finally, the enraged tyrant had all the saints, except for Photini, beheaded. She was thrown first into a deep, dry well and then into prison again. Photini now grieved that she was alone, that she had not received the crown of martyrdom together with her five sisters, Anatole, Photo, Photis, Paraskeve and Kyriake and her two sons, Photeinos and Joseph. Night and day she prayed for release from this life. One night, God appeared to her, made the sign of the cross over her three times. The vision filled her with joy. Many days later, while she hymned and blessed God, Saint Photini gave her soul into God's hands. The Samaritan Woman conversed with Christ by the well of Jacob, near the city of Sychar. She drank of the "living water" and gained everlasting life and glory. For generation after generation, Orthodox Christians have addressed this prayer to the woman exalted by the Messiah when He sat by the well in Samaria and talked with her:

Illuminated by the Holy Spirit, All-Glorious One, from Christ the Saviour you drank the water of salvation.
With open hand you give it to those who thirst.
Great-Martyr Photini, Equal-to-the-Apostles, pray to Christ for the salvation of our souls.


Photini’s Story in Scripture: John 4:4-42

Now he had to go through Samaria. 5 So he came to a town in Samaria called Sychar, near the plot of ground Jacob had given to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was there, and Jesus, tired as he was from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about noon.

7 When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” 8 (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)

9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])

Saint Photini, The Samaritan Woman at the Well

Saint Photini, The Samaritan Woman at the Well

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”

11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”

13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”

16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied.

Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

19 “Sir,” the woman said, “I can see that you are a prophet. 20 Our ancestors worshiped on this mountain, but you Jews claim that the place where we must worship is in Jerusalem.”

21 “Woman,” Jesus replied, “believe me, a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem. 22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks. 24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.”

25 The woman said, “I know that Messiah” (called Christ) “is coming. When he comes, he will explain everything to us.”

26 Then Jesus declared, “I, the one speaking to you—I am he.”

The Disciples Rejoin Jesus

27 Just then his disciples returned and were surprised to find him talking with a woman. But no one asked, “What do you want?” or “Why are you talking with her?”

28 Then, leaving her water jar, the woman went back to the town and said to the people, 29 “Come, see a man who told me everything I ever did. Could this be the Messiah?” 30 They came out of the town and made their way toward him.

31 Meanwhile his disciples urged him, “Rabbi, eat something.”

32 But he said to them, “I have food to eat that you know nothing about.”

33 Then his disciples said to each other, “Could someone have brought him food?”

34 “My food,” said Jesus, “is to do the will of him who sent me and to finish his work. 35 Don’t you have a saying, ‘It’s still four months until harvest’? I tell you, open your eyes and look at the fields! They are ripe for harvest. 36 Even now the one who reaps draws a wage and harvests a crop for eternal life, so that the sower and the reaper may be glad together. 37 Thus the saying ‘One sows and another reaps’ is true. 38 I sent you to reap what you have not worked for. Others have done the hard work, and you have reaped the benefits of their labor.”

Many Samaritans Believe

39 Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, “He told me everything I ever did.” 40 So when the Samaritans came to him, they urged him to stay with them, and he stayed two days. 41 And because of his words many more became believers.

42 They said to the woman, “We no longer believe just because of what you said; now we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man really is the Savior of the world.”

____________________________

-Therese Koturbash, Women’s Ordination Worldwide Communications Team
Therese Koturbash, BA, LLB, GDCL served as Canadian Delegate to Women’s Ordination Worldwide from 2008 to 2013. For all five of those years, she was elected member of WOW's four person International Leadership Circle. She has also been the National Coordinator of Canada's Catholic Network for Women's Equality. Today, Therese serves on WOW’s Communications Team and is a volunteer with WOW member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research. Her paid work is as a family attorney.

Notes:

  1. St. Photini, The Samaritan Woman Commemorated February 26, Orthodox Christianity, adapted from Saints and Sisterhood: The lives of forty-eight Holy Women by Eva Catafygiotu Topping, Light and Life Publishing Company , 5/10/2015

Florence Li Tim Oi: a saint for our times - by Jesse Zink

li tim oi 2.jpg

Li Tim Oi is the first woman ordained in the Anglican Communion. Her ordination happened in during World War II in Macau. In 2007, the Anglican Communion celebrated the centennial of her birth. In 2018, she was made a permanent part of the Episcopal Church's calendar of saints. She is also memorialized in the calendar of the Anglican Church of Canada with a feast day on February 26. We learn more about her life here.
____________________

During World War II, the Diocese of Hong Kong found itself in a tight spot. Refugees were leaving mainland China and coming to places like Hong Kong and Macao (which was also in the diocese). Travel was difficult and dangerous, and resources and food were scarce. When Hong Kong itself fell to the Japanese, even more people were displaced. Anglican church leaders tried to respond to the great human need they encountered but there were an insufficient number of clergy and it was difficult to access all parishes in the diocese.

In the middle of this situation was a woman named Li Tim Oi (who was sometimes known by the English name Florence). In 1941, at the age of 34, she had been ordained a deacon at St. John’s Cathedral in Hong Kong. Afterwards, she was sent to Macao. Given the dangers of the war, to get back and forth between Hong Kong and Macao she often had to disguise herself as an older woman or travel in small boats that could more easily evade the Japanese military.

In Macao, Li Tim Oi’s ministry focused on the great needs of the people there. As she recalled, “There was hardly any food, it was so scarce. Many people starved to death. Even if you had money it was difficult to buy rice. The merchants controlled the market and kept the rice scarce and the price high.” It was not uncommon on her walk to church in the morning to pass the bodies of those who had died of hunger the night before. Through her resourcefulness, she managed to find a source of rice and help distribute it to members of her congregation and others in need. She helped arrange medical care for those who needed it and taught children in an informal school. She visited the mortuary to help people identify deceased family members and performed countless funerals. Her ministry was all-encompassing and through her ministry not only were people’s needs served but more people began to join the church.

The pace of her ministry was also unrelenting. As she later said: “I was working long hours, and I got to bed very late. Sometimes there would be midnight emergencies, when people would knock on the door and get me up. I would start work again at six o’clock. One day the doctor tested my chest. ‘If you carry on working like this,’ he said, ‘you will die very soon.’ But how could I stop? I didn’t sleep enough. I felt my heart pounding all the time, yet with so much to do I felt sure God would not let me die. I didn’t fear death, even though death was all around me.” I recently received a copy of a photographic history of Anglicanism in China and there is a striking picture of Li Tim Oi with the vestry of her church in 1945. I am struck by how young everyone in the picture is, including Li Tim Oi, and how determined they seem.

Li Tim Oi’s ordination was hugely controversial. The church press around the world had a mostly vitriolic reaction, focusing not on the efficacy of her ministry but on her gender. The 1948 Lambeth Conference reaffirmed that women should not be ordained priests. When the war ended, Li Tim Oi gave up her license to serve as a priest. She eventually moved to mainland China where she lived through the difficult years of the Cultural Revolution before moving to Canada in the early 1980s. There, she was again licensed as a priest where she served out her remaining years until her death in 1992. It wasn’t until the 1970s that some Anglican provinces, including Hong Kong, began to regularize the ordination of women.

As the war dragged on, it was harder and harder for priests to come to Macao even occasionally to offer sacramental ministry. At her ordination as a deacon, Li Tim Oi had been given permission to baptize, marry, and perform funerals. But she couldn’t preside at Communion. Finally, in 1943, the Bishop of Hong, Ronald Hall, decided that Li Tim Oi was effectively performing the ministry of a priest and should be ordained one. And that’s what he did: on January 25, 1944, after a difficult journey to the bishop in mainland China, Florence Li Tim Oi was ordained a priest. She was the first woman so ordained in the Anglican Communion.

Li Tim Oi’s ordination was hugely controversial. The church press around the world had a mostly vitriolic reaction, focusing not on the efficacy of her ministry but on her gender. The 1948 Lambeth Conference reaffirmed that women should not be ordained priests. When the war ended, Li Tim Oi gave up her license to serve as a priest. She eventually moved to mainland China where she lived through the difficult years of the Cultural Revolution before moving to Canada in the early 1980s. There, she was again licensed as a priest where she served out her remaining years until her death in 1992. It wasn’t until the 1970s that some Anglican provinces, including Hong Kong, began to regularize the ordination of women.

Florence Li Tim Oi is commemorated on our church calendar every year on February 26, the date of her death. This year that commemoration coincides with Ash Wednesday, which takes precedence. In my experience, many commemorations of Li Tim Oi focus on her novelty: first female Anglican priest. It is right and proper that we should note this. But as I think about Li Tim Oi, I find myself more drawn to her ministry. At a time of exceptional human need, she served as the glue that held together a Christian community and helped that community live as a light to the world. This she did in a church that struggled to fully recognize her ministry.

It is often been said that the church is a female organization led by men. Li Tim Oi is hardly alone. Across the church, there are countless faithful women who labour under unnecessary burdens and do so with grace and skill. We live in a world with an increasing number of refugees and dramatic human need. We rightly honour Li Tim Oi not simply because she was first but because her model of Christian action in the world is one we cannot forget.
_____________________________

This piece was written by Principal Jesse Zink for this week’s Wingèd Ox, a weekly news digest distributed to the college community of Montreal Dio.

The quotations from Florence Li Tim Oi come from Much Beloved Daughter: The Story of Florence Li Tim Oi by Ted Harrison. The image of Florence Li Tim Oi and her vestry comes from Thy Kingdom Come: A Photographic History of Anglicanism in Hong Kong, Macau, and Mainland China.

The Inevitable Impotence of Male-Only 'Authority' by H. Lillian Vogl

The terms “power” and “authority” have two rather different sets of connotations. The positive connotation is generative: potency to do something significant, and to be the source, the author, of new things. The negative connotation is destructive: control over other people in order to wage war, command slaves, or at least enforce social conformity. Of course wielders of destructive power and authority often claim that their control is ultimately exercised for constructive ends, but what they construct is Empire, which rewards a few with luxury, leisure, and honor, and crushes the many, in body and spirit, beneath its voracious demands for labor and natural resources. Only the generative type of power and authority can grow and expand without taking something away from another.

Generation requires male and female potency to combine together, and the sacrificial provision of material support to allow new things to develop into maturity. It requires a mother’s womb and milk, or Mother Earth, to become anything more than the frozen potential of a seed. Even male authors of ancient texts regularly invoked the assistance of the female Muses to birth their poetry. Masculine potency is quite incapable of generative power on its own.

It seems inevitable, then, that whenever and wherever the Church denies or submerges the manifestation of the power and authority of the Holy Spirit through the biologically female members of the Body of Christ, it renders itself impotent at best, and engorged with a destructive lust for control and empire-building at worst.

The Exclusion of Women From Church Authority

It’s a matter of extensive debate among historians, archaeologists, Scripture scholars, and theologians how soon after Jesus Christ’s ascension, and how extensively across different local church communities, this exclusion of women from positions of power and authority within the Church happened. The New Testament itself provides contradictory indicators, both repeating contemporary cultural expectations of women’s subordination and at the same time naming women as apostles, deacons, and missionaries. The exclusively-male authors of canonical texts and the “Early Church Fathers” do not name women as priests or bishops as such, but archaeological evidence seems to depict some women exercising these types of offices of authority. Less well-known ancient texts also contain evidence that women did, in fact, exercise authority in some Christian communities, and that powerful men have long disapproved of this.

Saint Perpetua’s prison diary, believed to have been written in 203 AD, preserves an actual feminine perspective of the early Christian faith worth dying for, one in which she made decisions for herself and her infant son without permission from her husband or father, and was rewarded for her faith with fantastic visions of heaven and conquering evil. “I became a man,” this well-educated nursing mother wrote about her vision of conquering the devil in the arena, shortly before she was brought naked and unashamed before the maddening crowd to meet her Maker. Later church officials did see fit to name her in the Litany of Saints, alongside her servant companion Felicity, but few know anything about these courageous young mothers besides the fact of their martyrdom. I have never seen it commented upon anywhere that Perpetua did not submit in any respect to her husband’s authority, nor that she and companion Saturus were implored in another vision to broker peace from heaven between a bishop and priest and their Christian followers who were at odds.

What is clear is that no Christian women were involved in the ecumenical councils that began in the 4th century AD, which established the canonical texts of the Bible, the Nicaean and Athanasian creeds, and other major points of Christian dogma. From this point until the emergence of certain Protestant sects over a thousand years later, the “official” Church only acknowledged the power and authority of the Holy Spirit working through the recipients of “Holy Orders.” Only priests could invoke the power of the Holy Spirit to make Christ present in the Eucharist, and only the men with the highest level of ordination, the Bishops and Patriarchs, were seen as legitimate agents of the Spirit’s teaching authority. Women were never granted these levels of ordination by the men who constructed this system of managing the Body of Christ through a formal hierarchical structure. Even when certain church communities rejected Holy Orders as a prerequisite to preaching or offering communion, they typically relied on a few verses from the New Testament to maintain the ban on women exercising these forms of power and authority.

The Blood Of the Martyrs?

For a millennium and a half at least, any potency the Holy Spirit gave to women was prophylactically separated from any potency given to men. During this time, the Church “spread” primarily by conquest and colonialism. “The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church,” Tertullian wrote a few years before Perpetua’s martyrdom. This “blood” might have held a double entendre, or at least an implication of innocent sacrifice, in an era when many of the martyrs were women who preferred to submit their bodies to God’s care in eternity rather than submit to marriages pressed upon them by their fathers and Roman law. This phrase took on entirely different connotations when overlaid onto crusading and colonialist Christendom, and bloody martyrdom became primarily a fate of men who were associated by indigenous peoples, rightly or wrongly, with their oppressive conquerors, or who were caught up in destructive power struggles between warring “Christian” sects or rulers.

The conversion of large portions of the surviving indigenous people of the Americas is attributable not to any martyr, but to a comforting, un-bloody display of female generative power and authority: Our Lady of Guadalupe. The Mother of God had to speak with such a miraculous display of divine power that even the Bishop could not deny her authenticity. This voice pregnant with life-giving tenderness drew millions of people to be baptized by water and the Spirit into her family, despite such baptisms being performed by the same coterie of men who were taking their land and exploiting their labor. To this day, the descendants of the indigenous people of the Americas are significantly more likely to profess an active Christian faith than the descendants of the European tribes that were subsumed into the Holy Roman Empire.

But Christendom is slowly losing its controlling authority over the minds of people all over the world, only faster in its long-favored haunts of Europe. The alarmingly frequent contemporary martyrdoms among “brown peoples” do not seem to have a general growth effect anymore (assuming they ever did). Europe got out of the empire expansion game after two devastating world wars in the last century, and has largely pulled out of missionary endeavors as well. The United States of America has tried to pick up the mantle of global empire and missionary leadership, but this too is sputtering today. Certain segments of Christian society seek to grow through natalism—focusing on the generative power of sexual reproduction between “good Christian spouses”—only to see many of their children drift or run away from a subculture they find oppressive. In the face of such rapid decline of Christian affiliation, some seem to have concluded that the Holy Spirit has given up on the Great Commission and consigned itself to preserving a remnant from the fires of hell.

But Jesus Christ did not come into the world to condemn most of it, but that all might be saved. His death and resurrection exposed the lie of Empire’s claims to power and authority. The power and authority of God is generative, not controlling. For the Holy Spirit to accomplish God’s good works through members of the Body of Christ, leaders of the Church must shed their control and repent of exercising power and authority in such a destructive way. They must remove the prophylatic of gender discrimination and segregation in the Church and allow the Holy Spirit to blow where it will. They must speak of power and authority in generative terms, like Jesus’s many agricultural parables, and show that they mean it by laying down their rhetorical and excommunicative swords.

When the “leaders” of the Church get out of God’s way, the prophecy of Joel can yet be realized (which also contains promises for a ravished environment, for which the most powerful leader in the Christian world claims to care deeply):

Then the Lord became jealous for his land, and had pity on his people.

In response to his people the Lord said:

I am sending you grain, wine, and oil, and you will be satisfied;

and I will no more make you a mockery among the nations.

I will remove the northern army far from you, and drive it into a parched and desolate land….

Do not fear, O soil; be glad and rejoice, for the Lord has done great things!

Do not fear, you animals of the field, for the pastures of the wilderness are green;

the tree bears its fruit, the fig tree and vine give their full yield.

O children of Zion, be glad and rejoice in the Lord your God;

for he has given the early rain for your vindication,

he has poured down for you abundant rain, the early and the later rain, as before.

The threshing floors shall be full of grain, the vats shall overflow with wine and oil.

I will repay you for the years that the swarming locust has eaten,

the hopper, the destroyer, and the cutter, my great army, which I sent against you.

You shall eat in plenty and be satisfied, and praise the name of the Lord your God, who has dealt wondrously with you.

Then afterward I will pour out my spirit on all flesh;

your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,

your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men shall see visions.

Even on the male and female slaves, in those days, I will pour out my spirit.

——-

H. Lillian Vogl calls herself an “accidental mystic” because she is a tax attorney and mother, not a theologian or religious. Nevertheless, after 40 years of sitting in the pews of many different churches, she was called by the Spirit to preach. She began with a blog named Beyond All Telling, and is continuing to discern where this calling will take her next.

Lost in Translation by Nancy Fitzgerald - February 25, 2020

Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

It was a random Sunday in Ordinary Time and I made my way up to the ambo for the liturgy of the Word. “Sisters and brothers,” I read from Paul’s letter to the Colossians, “put on, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, heartfelt compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, bearing with one another and forgiving one another.”

It’s a beautiful, challenging passage, and I tried to proclaim it with joy. In my parish, I’m a lector, and joyful proclamation is what I’m supposed to do.

Problem was, I’d transposed a couple of words: Sisters and brothers, I’d said, instead of brothers and sisters. And somewhere in the congregation of my quiet little parish, the Vatican Police were ready to pounce. A few weeks later, when my turn to read at Mass came around again, our pastor met me in the sacristy with a stern warning. “Some people were complaining,” he said. “Be sure to read exactly what the Scripture says.”

But Scripture, it turns out, says something a little different than the words in the lectionary. In the New American Bible, Paul addresses his letter simply to the “holy ones and faithful brothers in Christ.” No sisters in sight. The lectionary, it turns out, isn’t a word-for-word transcription of the Bible; the men who compile the readings for Mass tweak them first. “When a biblical translation is meant for liturgical proclamation,” the US Conference of Catholic Bishops wrote in 1997, “it must also take into account those principles [of inclusive language]. . . . since the text is proclaimed in the Christian assembly to women and men who possess equal baptismal dignity.” 

Which got me thinking. As a writer and editor, I’m careful to use gender-inclusive language, or to do some light revision whenever necessary. Fireman becomes firefighter, of course—a no-brainer. The sentence The nurse checks her patient’s ID before administering medication can easily be recast as Nurses always check their patients’ IDs.  They’re simple fixes that avoid gender stereotyping, or excluding half the human race—without altering meaning. And when I first became a lector, a few decades ago, our workbook offered suggestions for changing masculine words and phrases into language that included all the humans in the congregation. 

Back in the early nineties, while that lector workbook was instructing readers to pencil in gender-inclusive changes to the readings, a team of scripture scholars, under the direction of the USCCB, was creating a new lectionary with inclusive English, which Donald Trautman, then-bishop of Erie, called “a major pastoral concern for the Church in the United States.” The scholars carefully followed the guidelines for translation provided in 1969 by Pope Paul VI.  

If we’re worthy of baptism, surely we’re also worthy of being named in the liturgy. If, as the fathers of the Second Vatican Council insisted, worship consists of “the full, active participation of all God’s holy people,” surely we mustn’t be so easily dismissed in the language of worship.

In 1991, the bishops approved the new lectionary—which replaced words like “mankind” with “humanity,” but retained masculine pronouns for God—and sent it off to Rome, where it received a seal of approval in 1992.

But Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and the Vatican’s biblical commission abruptly revoked approval in 1994 and sent a team of translators back to the drawing board. In the version they eventually produced, which debuted in 1998, the inclusive language was mostly gone

Richard Skilba, auxiliary bishop of Milwaukee, a member of the team that had worked on the inclusive lectionary, seemed to know what I—and many lectors—would face in the future. This gender-exclusive edition, he said, “is sure to consign us to yet another generation of pencil-marked texts.” 

So that was the lectionary I read from on that random Sunday in Ordinary Time. And when my turn rolled around again, it was the Fifth Sunday of Easter and my passage was from the first letter of John: God is love, and whoever remains in love remains in God and God in him.

If I’d been writing or speaking about that passage, I’d have said that “those who remain in love remain in God and God in them.” So that’s what I did. It felt like the right thing to do. It seemed like the only thing I could do.  Did that “harmonize with the true and authentic spirit” of the liturgy?  I’m not a biblical scholar, or a theologian, or a liturgist. But it felt true and authentic to me.

I still haven’t heard, but I’m expecting to be chastised. Stick to the script, I’ll probably be told. That’s what the official lector guidelines say. And in the spirit of humility, and of love for the church universal, I get that. Who am I to spot-correct Scripture?

But still. Words matter. Through the ministry of lector, I have the privilege of using my voice to proclaim Scripture for the entire congregation—including the women, to whom the Word is addressed as urgently as it is to men.

If we’re worthy of baptism, surely we’re also worthy of being named in the liturgy. If, as the fathers of the Second Vatican Council insisted, worship consists of “the full, active participation of all God’s holy people,” surely we mustn’t be so easily dismissed in the language of worship.

So I’m faced with a dilemma: The ministry of lector offers me deep spiritual nourishment; reading Scripture at Mass helps the Word come alive for me, and I hope for my listeners, too. But can I be a “good” Catholic and pencil in corrections to the lectionary’s masculine language? Or (maybe more importantly) can I be my authentic self before God if I don’t? Whichever way this goes, I’m pretty sure my days as a lector are numbered. It feels like my voice is being silenced.

Originally published on website of Women’s Ordination Worldwide member group Women’s Ordination Conference here: Lost in Translation - The Table - February 25, 2020

Exclusion of Women Diminishes the Catholic Faith - Joe D'Amore

Exclusion of Women Diminishes the Catholic
- Joe D’Amore

“We believed in Him on the strength of the woman’s testimony”

--Gospel of John 4:3

In all four Gospels of the New Testament, the story is told of Mary Magdala commissioned by Jesus to preach the “ good news.”

Mary Magdalene, Pietro Perugino, ca. 1500

Mary Magdalene, Pietro Perugino, ca. 1500

This first century woman was one of the first evangelists. When she answered a deep spiritual calling and Jesus sought her out, she responded “Rabbouni” (teacher) and with a directive from him she engaged the disciples. “… I have seen the Lord … .”

The 21st ecumenical council of the Roman Catholic Church, known as Vatican II (1962-65) became an explosive and progressive – in relative terms – spiritual renewal. It was also an occasion to promote unity in the church and a renaissance of engagement for spiritually moved women.

In a recent interview on National Public Radio, Sister Helen Prejean of the famed 1993 memoir “Dead Man Walking” relayed her experience in her new memoir, “The River of Fire,” as a young woman who had entered the convent in 1957.

“It was called ‘blind obedience,’ and by being obedient, that was how you got holy,” she said. A few years later in 1962, her world dramatically changed with the advent of Vatican II. Nuns were able to critique books, challenge canonical precepts, converse and share with each other and even choose their own ministry.

Despite the tentative foray into a renewal of inclusion, women remain unable to preach the Gospel. They are restricted from priesthood, participating in policy authority and also to serve as lay deacons. Sister Prejean expressed her laments in a letter directly to Pope Francis, but to no avail. Startingly, Sister Prejean is free to preach and does so regularly in Protestant churches.

In July, Jean Molesky-Poz revealed in America/A Jesuit Review an extraordinary break from tradition and church doctrine. In 1996, laywomen were allowed to deliver homilies in a northern California parish and thereby preach the “good news.”

The yearning was borne from the local faith community and the pastor conceded and was the spiritual guide for Catholic women who wanted to preach.

Molesky-Poz categorized the experience as a “gift” and the awakening in her parish galvanized not only the women who prepared and delivered homilies (preaching of the four Gospels at a Mass), but also the entire faith community. It was a unifying force and the promise it brought of strengthening faith, led by women, was a uniquely American spiritual experience.

The practice had expanded by 2009 when a newly appointed arrived bishop arrived on the scene imposed a prohibition to this fledgling practice . Suddenly, formal bans emerged in dioceses throughout the nation. This ran contrary to a major tenant from Vatican II where engagement by the laity in many aspects of worship and service was at least conceptually encouraged.

The restrictions were formally confirmed by a declaration made by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in 2001 which read, in part, “… the preaching by the faithful may not take place with Celebration of the Eucharist at the moment reserved for the homily.” In short, the church forcefully reaffirmed traditions the policy of holy orders as an exclusive privilege of men endured. Therefore, only male priests and deacons can preach.

The forces of history will eventually overwhelm this flawed thinking. And with either just a passing interest in religion or a truly devout bearing, one only needs to confirm that scripture originally established the balance intended.

Women excluded from critical thinking of church doctrine, policy formulation and even evangelizing simply leads the Catholic Church to fall short of what is likely intended by our Creator.

Joe D’Amore
Groveland, Massachusetts

Originally published in The Salem News, December 10, 2019

Do Catholic Feminists Wish to Smash the Church’s Patriarchy? - by Rebecca Bratten Weiss

Do Catholic Feminists Wish to Smash the Church’s Patriarchy?
by Rebecca Bratten Weiss | February 19, 2020February 19, 2020

Yes, Catholic feminists do want to smash the patriarchy. But what does this mean?

Fellow Patheos writer Rene Albert asked this in a recent post:

If ‘smashing the patriarchy’ is the goal of certain feminist Catholics, what do they even mean by that phrase? Is it to decolonize the Church from the influence of Constantine? Or does it mean undoing what Christ Himself had initially founded when He said to Peter, “…upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth, it shall be bound also in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose upon earth, it shall be loosed also in heaven (Matthew 16:18-19 DRA)?

It’s a valid question, and one that can’t be answered until we are clear on the fact that yes, there is such a thing as patriarchy, a society in which rule and power are held exclusively or predominantly by men. And yes, patriarchy is real. We live in a culture that is only transitioning out of our patriarchal past in which the spheres of politics, economics, and religious authority were dominated by men. It is not simply that women did not happen to compete on an equal level with men. It is not that women lacked the ability or the passion to do what men were doing: women were barred by law from participation in and leadership of most aspects of public life. Women were barred from schools and colleges. Women could not inherit property. Women could not be considered heirs to thrones. Women could not vote. And so, of course, the laws and strictures governing every aspect of human social life were drawn up exclusively by men. 

image credit: 725px-Annunciation_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

image credit: 725px-Annunciation_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg

This has been true not only in civil society but in religious life as well. While some world religions allowed women to take more of a central role, the major religions of the western world are all patriarchal. And this is a problem.

I know many will say, religious communities, Christianity in particular, are patriarchal because male leadership is natural and intended by God. They said the same about male leadership in civil life. They said the same about the right of the white European to steal indigenous territories. There is a pattern here. 

Men declared themselves the voice of reason, relegating women to the status of a lesser or submissive intelligence. Men declared themselves the channels of divine will, and hastened to assure us that, according to this will, they were intended to have dominion – over creation, over women.

The idea of patriarchy is connected with the idea of dominion, and of orders of power. This is why patriarchal structures intersect with other power-structures such as colonialism, class structure, and systems of racial or ethnic dominance. It is connected also with theses about humanity according to which “man” has a right to wield power over the earth, to lord it over all other creatures, to take and use according to his will. And so yes, in this sense, we do mean that we want to de-colonize the Church. But it goes deeper than this. 

Christianity has allied itself, repeatedly, over the centuries, with different dominance hierarchies, including the most rampantly unjust, such as slavery and colonialism. While some Christians, true to the gospels, were inspired by their faith to stand up against injustice, many others used their faith to excuse and even defend it. Christians sent colonizers to subjugate native peoples. Christians defended slavery and later segregation as divinely intended.  

Given this dubious history of the institutional church – as opposed to the people’s church, the folk church, the church of reformers – when it comes to defending ingrained secular power-structures, it is difficult for many of us to take it seriously when the church leaders persist in asserting that rule by men, in holy orders and the magisterium, is divinely intended. 

Arguments for a patriarchal Christian religion in which only males may have headship may be found in scripture, yes, but these passages supposedly “proving” divine intentions regarding priesthood and papacy are ambiguous – until, of course, we read back into them, anachronistically, centuries of male-dominated hermeneutic. Men have spent two thousand years telling women what Jesus’s words really meant, but when we look at the Gospels with our own eyes, especially with educated eyes, we find that arguments for all-male leadership are wildly inconclusive. It is not necessarily the case that only men were present at the Last Supper, for instance. Or that Jesus intended “do this in remembrance of me” to refer only to occasions when there was a man – let alone an ordained man – to preside. It would seem to be a variation on the Passover supper.

And for every instance in which the Twelve seem to be singled out, especially, we can point to other instances where women exclusively minister and preach the good news. A woman washed Jesus’s feet, as he later washes those of Peter.  Women stand by Jesus at the crucifixion. And a woman is the first to preach the resurrection. 

What does smashing the patriarchy mean, for Catholic feminists? It means living the Gospel.

Moreover, the very idea of dominance hierarchy runs counter to the very core of Jesus’s teachings of radical egalitarianism, teachings which upended every single societal prejudice regarding man and woman, slave and master, Jew and Greek. To take the teachings of Jesus and use them to defend a priestly power structure according to which those with exclusive power are exclusively able to act in persona Christi strikes me as a terrible corruption of the Gospel.

I am not arguing that the solution to clericalism and the culture of power in the church is simply to ordain women. I think we need to take time and consideration, reorienting ourselves towards the original intent of the Gospel teachings, and asking hard questions about how we went so wrong. We now resemble a rapacious Italian city-state but with bureaucratic tentacles worldwide. We defend our might protecting through violence. Instead of a refuge for victims, we now create the victims, just as empire always has. What became of the church described in Acts? It’s not just that the church developed and grew; it became a monstrous caricature of itself.

If we are to achieve true and not merely superficial reform we need to dismantle clericalism at its roots, get back to the teachings of Jesus – and this means jettisoning the presumptions of patriarchy just as we must jettison every artifice of division, dominance, and subjugation.

What does smashing the patriarchy mean, for Catholic feminists? It means living the Gospel.

— Rebecca Bratten Weiss is a freelance academic, writer, and organic grower.





Hildegard of Bingen and Sex Complementarity - by Dr. Shanon Sterringer - February 19, 2020

Hildegard of Bingen

Hildegard of Bingen

Hildegard of Bingen and Sex Complementarity
by Dr. Shanon Sterringer | February 19, 2020

“Hildegard is rightly considered as the foundress of the sex complementarity position.” This is a loaded statement written by Sister Prudence Allen, R.S.M. (appointed to the International Theological Commission by Pope Francis in 2014) in Volume One of her three volume work, The Concept of Woman (pg. 292). Complementarity is a highly controversial theological position created by Pope John Paul II in his series of addresses compiled into what is called, Theology of the Body. While Hildegard’s writings do articulate a rationale for the sexes and she believed everything in the created world is organized by divine plan, to cite her as the foundress for what is happening in the Church today under this new theology of JPII fails to understand her within her historical and cultural context. She did not abide by the boundaries created by a concept of sex complementarity, though her writings do indicate that she seemed to believe her call to leadership was unique and not the norm. “It is a womanish time” she often wrote, not because she was a radical feminist, but because the men of her day, particularly the clergy, had failed to step up and embrace their vocations. 

Why do I even care about this particular theological position? I served as a Director of Religious Education for almost two decades. In that time I watched a significant shift take place in the way in which the institution is catechizing. This concept of complementarity, "TOB" as it's called in Cleveland (also goes by the name of "The Culture Project") came in through a backdoor (a Trojan Horse) a decade or so ago and has infiltrated many of the dioceses across the U.S. Most parents are not directly involved with their children's catechetical programs (they trust the church to teach religion) and so there is an entire generation being indoctrinated with this distorted theology.  I began to "sound the alarm" over a decade ago, but with little support from those who should have been concerned. 

On the surface [complementarity] looks attractive - it teaches mutual respect of the sexes, or seems to.  The issue with it is that it has so tightly defined what is proper to the sexes, it divides rather than unifies women and men. There is no room in it for diversity.  Underneath the surface it is homophobic, misogynistic, judgmental, and is rooted in biblical fundamentalism.  It is a dangerous theology and we are allowing our children to be indoctrinated with it.

On the surface it looks attractive - it teaches mutual respect of the sexes, or seems to.  The issue with it is that it has so tightly defined what is proper to the sexes, it divides rather than unifies women and men. There is no room in it for diversity.  Underneath the surface it is homophobic, misogynistic, judgmental, and is rooted in biblical fundamentalism.  It is a dangerous theology and we are allowing our children to be indoctrinated with it. It is the required curriculum of this diocese (one of the "initiatives" Bp. Perez boasted about bringing  to Cleveland as he quickly packed his bags to move up the corporate ladder as the Archbishop of Philadelphia). The program is packaged in a way that suggests it is going to renew Catholicism and some are jumping on board because it is charismatic and easy to implement (you do not have to be a scholar to teach it - you just have to be able to hit play on the video and follow the manual provided). The diocese is demanding every catechist (day school and parish) be trained in it.  It is creating a cult, not fostering a healthy relationship with God. 

A second reason I have a vested interest in this theological movement is because Hildegard of Bingen is being touted by the institution as its foundress and that hits a nerve for me.

Hildegard of Bingen is being touted by the institution as its foundress and that hits a nerve for me.

Hildegard of Bingen was a 12th century German Benedictine nun and a genius. Pope Benedict XVI canonized her on May 10, 2012 and named her the 4th female Doctor of the Church on October 7, 2012. The depth of her creativity is in a class of its own – her music, art, theology, preaching, and leadership. Like Thomas Aquinas, she left us a “summa” which scholars are still trying to unpack. Her major works include Scivias, Liber Vitae Meritorum, Liber Divinorum Operum, Physica, Causae et Curae, Lingua Ignota, Correspondence (letters), Ordo Virtutum, and Symphonia. Her minor works include two hagiographies, parts of her vita, an interpretation of the Benedictine Rule, a collection of homilies, and a document written to the Monk Guibert of Gembloux answering 38 Theological Questions.  She built two monasteries, ran an infirmary, went on preaching tours, and served as a spiritual advisor to emperors, bishops, abbots/abbesses, and the laity. She was a scholar and a mystic. She not only experienced the Living Light, she embodied it. How is it then that a woman so brilliant and competent, a woman whose counsel was sought after by some of highest-ranking men of her day, refers to herself as a weak and unlearned vessel? Her writings repeatedly refer to woman as the weaker, and even misbegotten, sex. These are words we eagerly trace back to Augustine and Aquinas, not a renegade woman like Hildegard! 

While there is some question as to whether or not her excessive reference to women as the weaker sex was a technique she used to manipulate her own position of authority in a patriarchal culture, her scientific texts suggest she believed it on some level. It was the generally accepted view of the day (a few years later Aquinas will emphasize it in his writings). There is a trend today to purge this part of her works and focus exclusively on her eco-feminism. Her mystical awareness of our interconnectedness with the earth, viriditas, and the entire cosmos presents an image of the divine beyond any theological construct. She had the eyes and ears of a mystic and could see the presence of God in everything she touched, including herbs, trees, and precious stones. Yet, she was also staunchly conservative in her theological views and did not sugarcoat her words when faced with what she perceived as heretical ideas (e.g. the teachings of the Cathars). As much as it pains me to say this, Hildegard was not a feminist, at least not by today’s standards. She was very much a product of her time and culture. If we are going to respect her integrity, we must acknowledge who she was in her historical context (for good or ill) and what influences may have shaped her worldview at that time. But, I do not believe she would endorse Theology of the Body today either and it is a discredit to scholarship to read back into her works an anachronistic interpretation of a theology that emerged in the 20th century with a JPII. 

Contributing Author Dr. Shanon Sterringer

Contributing Author Dr. Shanon Sterringer

In the Middle Ages (and sadly still today), women who assume to possess knowledge and authority over and above men in the Church are often condemned as heretics. It did not take much for a woman to find herself banished, excommunicated, or worse. If Hildegard had been born a century or so later, she may have been accused of witchcraft or possession and burned at the stake. By the grace of God, however, she was born early enough and had the intellect to maneuver a path through the patriarchal system for eighty-one years. If she was just another “product of her time” subject to the same discriminatory attitudes we are battling today, what makes her so special in regard to changing the trajectory of women in leadership roles in the Church today?Hildegard of Bingen was able to move beyond the social and religious obstacles of her day and modeled an example of ethical and creative leadership which to this day is extraordinary.

In the Middle Ages (and sadly still today), women who assume to possess knowledge and authority over and above men in the Church are often condemned as heretics. It did not take much for a woman to find herself banished, excommunicated, or worse. If Hildegard had been born a century or so later, she may have been accused of witchcraft or possession and burned at the stake. By the grace of God, however, she was born early enough and had the intellect to maneuver a path through the patriarchal system for eighty-one years. If she was just another “product of her time” subject to the same discriminatory attitudes we are battling today, what makes her so special in regard to changing the trajectory of women in leadership roles in the Church today? Hildegard of Bingen was able to move beyond the social and religious obstacles of her day and modeled an example of ethical and creative leadership which to this day is extraordinary. She was bound by the world in which she was formed, and at times she was blinded by it, but her visions took her to a level outside of her time and place. For example, her innate understanding of the theological concept of viriditas (greening life-force) which animates and sustains everything in the created world (not only in the physical sense but in mind and spirit) is remarkable. For most of our Judeo-Christian history, women have been considered ritually unclean due to the fact that we menstruate and give birth.  Until recently, women in the Roman Catholic tradition had to be “re-churched” following childbirth before being permitted back into the Church. Many mothers missed the baptisms of their own children because they were not yet ritually cleansed and therefore were not permitted into the sacred space. Giving birth is the most sacred act a human being can engage in, how could it possibly leave a woman – someone who had literally “given her body” for another - impure in the eyes of God? A couple of years ago, I was invited to offer a seminar on women and leadership in the Roman Catholic Church in a seminary in India. At the breakout session, one of the seminarians came up to the microphone and said, “I hear what you are saying, and I do not have a problem with girls functioning as altar servers. However, how can we keep track of who is eligible to serve because they cannot be in the sanctuary when they have their menstrual cycle?” Needless to say, I was shocked by the comment. It had not dawned on me that in this part of the world, women are still considered “unclean” due to the fact we are physically designed to bring new life into this world. If we are honest, one of the underlying reasons women are not admitted to ordained ministry today is because we bleed. Hildegard stood apart from the attitude of her day in this regard. She saw a woman’s menstrual cycle and her ability to bring forth life as a sign of viriditas. “For woman, the rivulet of menstruation indicates her greenness and flowering that blooms in her offspring. As a tree from its greenness brings forth blossoms and leaves and bears fruit, so too woman, from the greenness of the rivulets of menstrual blood, brings forth blossoms and leaves in the fruit of her womb…” (Berger, 1999, pg. 82)I am an ordained priest and am deeply in love with Hildegard of Bingen. I have dedicated over a decade of my life to her. As I prepared for ordination, I had some difficult conversations with her writings because Hildegard did not support the notion of women priests. She clearly states this in Scivias. I had to come to understand that while she was a woman ahead of her time, she could not comprehend the world through a lens that was not accessible to her at that particular place and time in history. Her writings need to be read in their historical and cultural context, the same as we read the Scriptures. To lift her writings from the pages of history and simply drop them into a contemporary context without interpretation is fundamentalism and Catholics are not fundamentalists… If Hildegard were to return today, and I believe her spirit is very much alive in various ways, it is very likely she would have a different understanding of the sexes and divinely ordered roles than she had 900+ years ago. Our understanding of who God is and how we are called to be in relationship to God and each other evolves as we grow in wisdom, knowledge, and grace.  Our understanding of God has certainly evolved since the 12th century, especially as new scholarly methods emerge and archeological discoveries surface. If we are tuned into the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives, our hearts will be opened, and our minds will be changed through our personal experiences. I am positive Hildegard would have continued to grow and evolve in her theological views had she lived for a millennium... Our task as scholars is to take the wisdom of those who have gone before us and build on the work they started. She may have planted the seeds that have grown into the contemporary concept of sex complementarity, but I do not believe she would recognize the fruit it has produced.

__________________________________________

Rev. Dr. Shanon Sterringer is a theologian and an ordained priest (ARCWP) with over two decades of pastoral experience and a strong advocate for holistic health/spirituality.  Her background includes a Ph.D. (2016) from Union Institute & University in Ethical and Creative Leadership (she focused on the example of St. Hildegard of Bingen); a D.Min (2012) and a MA in Theology (2007) from St. Mary's Seminary and Graduate School of Theology; a MA in Ministry (2011) from Ursuline College; and a BA (2003) from Cleveland State University.   She is a certified minister. She has training in pastoral care/counseling and sacramental preparation including marriage and funerals. She has received a number of awards and acknowledgements over the years for her academic and pastoral achievements.  She is the author of a daily meditation book, 30 Day Journey with St. Hildegard of Bingen (fortress press 2019).

She is married and is the mother of 3 beautiful adult daughters.  In her spare time she is an amateur beekeeper and she loves to be outside walking, collecting Lake Erie Beach Glass, and reading. 

Her greatest passion is St. Hildegard of Bingen and her second spiritual home is on the Rhine River in Germany! She has dedicated her life to discovering creative ways to help others renew their greenness (viriditas) of mind, body, and spirit.  

Shanon’s blog can be found at thegreenshepherdess.org

The Flawed Nuptial Imagery In Querida Amazonia - What Can Women Do? - by Anonymous

image credit: pixabay-photos-tunnel-silhouette-mysterious-899053.jpg

image credit: pixabay-photos-tunnel-silhouette-mysterious-899053.jpg

The Flawed Nuptial Imagery in Querida Amazonia – What Can Women Do?
Suspended in Her Jar | February 16, 2020

Preface by Rebecca Bratten Weiss:

There is much that is profound and extraordinary in the post-synodal apostolic exhortation Querida Amazonia. But, inevitably, there is also much that is troubling. One passage that seems especially theologically as well as sociologically problematic came up several times in conversations I had with Catholic women who are working for reform in the church:

Jesus Christ appears as the Spouse of the community that celebrates the Eucharist through the figure of a man who presides as a sign of the one Priest. This dialogue between the Spouse and his Bride, which arises in adoration and sanctifies the community, should not trap us in partial conceptions of power in the Church. The Lord chose to reveal his power and his love through two human faces: the face of his divine Son made man and the face of a creature, a woman, Mary. Women make their contribution to the Church in a way that is properly theirs, by making present the tender strength of Mary, the Mother. As a result, we do not limit ourselves to a functional approach, but enter instead into the inmost structure of the Church. In this way, we will fundamentally realize why, without women, the Church breaks down, and how many communities in the Amazon would have collapsed, had women not been there to sustain them, keep them together and care for them. This shows the kind of power that is typically theirs.

The first thing that struck me as jarring in this passage was the theology of the imago dei. If only men show forth the face of the divine Son, and women only show forth the face of a creature, this suggests that only men, and not women, are made in the image of God. It also suggests that the spousal relationship between a man and a woman is analogous to that between creature and creation. As if the tired dualism of “complementarity” (active/passive, initiation/reception) were not derogatory enough already. 

The first thing that struck me as jarring in this passage was the theology of the imago dei. If only men show forth the face of the divine Son, and women only show forth the face of a creature, this suggests that only men, and not women, are made in the image of God. It also suggests that the spousal relationship between a man and a woman is analogous to that between creature and creation. As if the tired dualism of “complementarity” (active/passive, initiation/reception) were not derogatory enough already.

Moreover, the underlying “logic” of denying women expanded roles in the church appears to be “women were crucial in performing these roles that helped hold communities together; therefore, it would not be fitting to allow them officially to take on these roles that helped hold communities together.” 

The effectiveness of image, the piquancy of style, the clarity of reasoning, suddenly give way to incoherence, as soon as gender roles come up in this document. This is normal. This is what we women have come to anticipate when it comes to magisterial documents. We’re past the point of just shutting up and buying it, however – past the point simply of murmuring about it; we are ready to stand up and declare why this theology is wrong.

A friend of mine, who was discussing this issue with us, offered the following reflection on the inadequacies of this nuptial imagery, especially at a time when so many women are feeling that they need to leave the institutional church to protect their own sanity. 

I share the following guest reflection from a Catholic woman and scholar who would prefer to remain anonymous:

I think the “nuptial imagery” that got so badly distorted in Querida Amazonia is actually very helpful in considering the question of leaving or staying, and why that’s a tricky and personal decision.

Basically, you’re wedded to a groom who is not actually Jesus, but a Jesus-impersonator. He’s constantly trying to manipulate you to stay and has a narcissistic streak, ignores your feelings and needs, and sometimes verbally cuts you down or gaslights you. (We’re not even talking about the physically/sexually abusive situations here—these clearly need to leave to survive.) You do get to live in a spiritual home, which has probably provided you with some comfort and children and neighbors, which you would lose if you leave. Do you?

I think the “nuptial imagery” that got so badly distorted in Querida Amazonia is actually very helpful in considering the question of leaving or staying, and why that’s a tricky and personal decision.

Basically, you’re wedded to a groom who is not actually Jesus, but a Jesus-impersonator. He’s constantly trying to manipulate you to stay and has a narcissistic streak, ignores your feelings and needs, and sometimes verbally cuts you down or gaslights you. (We’re not even talking about the physically/sexually abusive situations here—these clearly need to leave to survive.) You do get to live in a spiritual home, which has probably provided you with some comfort and children and neighbors, which you would lose if you leave. Do you?

It mostly depends on whether you believe you can survive and thrive without him. Maybe your income is totally dependent on your loyalty to him, which would make it really hard to leave, maybe impossible, so you stay and keep pleading with him to treat you better and pray for the best.

Maybe he’s gaslighted you so effectively that you believe you can’t survive on your own, even though you have a job and means of income apart from him. Or maybe he’s threatened to kill you (send you to hell or at least cut you off from the lifeblood of God) if you leave, and you believe that. Clearly, you’re better off leaving, but you need other people to support you in overcoming the self-doubt and/or threats.

Maybe you have children that you’d have to leave behind if you left. That’s a really tough one because you want to and can save yourself, but you’re not sure if you can save them from their toxic father. It takes a leap of faith that they’ll survive and hopefully find a way to follow you after you leave.

Or maybe you have a steady source of income unconnected to this narcissistic spouse, self-confidence and/or supportive friends, and you don’t have kids or they’re capable of making good decisions for themselves, so you walk away fairly easily with few regrets. You may miss your old house and your old neighbors sometimes, but your new life is so much happier now, so it was clearly the right decision for you.

Or maybe you have the capacity to leave, but you’re staying because you keep hoping and praying he’ll change. Because you made a commitment and you don’t want to break it, or you don’t want to be a quitter.

In that case, let me share with you what happened in my real life marriage:

I was miserable for the first twelve years of my marriage. No matter what I did to try to communicate clearly and politely what was problematic to me, my husband didn’t seem to care. Sometimes he was verbally abusive, other times he was just annoying and not very helpful. Part of the time I was too vulnerable financially and with small children to even consider leaving. But I finally got to the point where I was resourced enough to not need his financial contributions and my children old enough to speak for themselves. I told my husband I was no longer committed to staying with him and took off my wedding rings. I told him I wanted to take steps toward separation, and started with sleeping in another room.

Then, and only then, he finally listened to my complaints and taking responsibility for changing. He listened to marriage self-help recordings, started seeing a counselor and taking anti-anxiety medication, and helping out more around the house without any complaining about it. He started respecting my autonomy to think differently from him and make my own choices. It’s hard for him to let me choose to do things apart from him because we have different interests and beliefs, but he’s learning not to try to guilt-trip me for that, and to quietly let our differences go or try to understand my perspective.

This is what I hope for the Catholic Church. If the hierarchy could give us autonomy to live out our diverse convictions and gifts, and respect for our dignity and various vocations, it would be best if we never had to permanently move out and divorce. But I think the only chance we have for prompting change is to start a trial separation. And there’s always a risk when you do that, that the church may just hurl more insults at us on the way out the door, change the locks, and be unwilling to change. We have to be prepared for that to happen, mentally accepting the possibility this will be permanent when we walk out that door, even if we don’t want it to be.

We also should resist the pressure or impulse to “renew vows” just because of incremental changes. If we had the resources to break free in the first place, we should try to remain free to leave if they revert to uncaring behaviors again. My wedding rings are still sitting in a jewelry box several months after we started sharing a bed again. And family life continues to be pretty peaceful, if not romantic or euphoric.

If Pope Francis approved women deacons, I probably would stay, as long as I didn’t hear any continued threats from the priesthood that I’d go to hell or not “have Jesus” if I left, but I wouldn’t seek out any paid job in the church that I could be fired from if I spoke out against potential injustices.

The metaphor breaks down, of course, because no one of us leaving or communicating intent to leave has the impact that a wife leaving her husband has. “Wives” of the church have been trickling out for decades, but it’s never added up to something consequential enough for the clergy to chase after us. I really think the only hope for change for the Catholic Church is if people (who are in a reasonable position to do so) “strike” or leave en masse, like they’ve done in Germany. Otherwise it’s each spiritually abused bride for herself.

The metaphor breaks down, of course, because no one of us leaving or communicating intent to leave has the impact that a wife leaving her husband has. “Wives” of the church have been trickling out for decades, but it’s never added up to something consequential enough for the clergy to chase after us. I really think the only hope for change for the Catholic Church is if people (who are in a reasonable position to do so) “strike” or leave en masse, like they’ve done in Germany. Otherwise it’s each spiritually abused bride for herself.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/suspendedinherjar/2020/02/flawed-nuptial-imagery-in-querida-amazonia/?fbclid=IwAR0qCHouKqdLb76K5_uMznC9hOpo_utrmuwkaD5ftcqG6L5kR5EGJspQ70U

Saint Apollonia - Woman Deacon and Martyr - Connection to the Case for Women's Ordination

Saint Apollonia, by Francisco de Zurbarán, Museum of Louvre, from the Convent of the Order of Our Lady of Mercy and the Redemption of the Captives Discalced of Saint Joseph (Seville).

Saint Apollonia, by Francisco de Zurbarán, Museum of Louvre, from the Convent of the Order of Our Lady of Mercy and the Redemption of the Captives Discalced of Saint Joseph (Seville).

February 9 is the feast day of 3rd century deaconess and martyr Saint Apollonia. Despite resistance to restoration of the women’s diaconate, her story gives evidence to the fact that the women’s diaconate is nothing new. Women were deacons and there is no justification to exclude us from this vocation now. And as for priesthood — according to ancient tradition, women or men on the way to martyrdom had the power to forgive sins. This is a function of priesthood. Women were part of this and there is no reason that we should be excluded from it today.

Remembrance of Apollonia gives us an opportunity to learn more about women deacons and her role — as a woman — in priesthood

Going Deeper

Saint Apollonia was a deaconess who lived in the early part of the third century. She suffered martyrdom during an uprising against Christians in Alexandria, Egypt. Her story records that after being brutally beaten, she jumped into a fire in order to avoid being forced to recite blasphemous sayings. [1] Her torture included having all of her teeth violently pulled out or shattered. Because of this, she is held as patron of dentistry and those suffering from toothache or other dental problems.

Her martyrdom is said to have happened before the Decian persecution ordered by Roman Emperor Trajan Decius in 250 AD. [2] In a letter addressed to the Bishop of Antioch, Dionysius[3], the Bishop of Alexandria (247–265) records details of her martyrdom along with the sufferings of his people. [4] After describing how a Christian man and woman were killed by the mob, and how the houses of Christians were pillaged, Dionysius writes:

At that time Apollonia, parthénos presbytis [meaning virgin priest but she is remembered in today’s liturgical calendar as deacon] was held in high esteem. These men seized her also and by repeated blows broke all her teeth. They then erected outside the city gates a pile of wood and threatened to burn her alive if she refused to repeat after them impious words (either a blasphemy against Christ, or an invocation of the heathen gods). Given, at her own request, a little freedom, she sprang quickly into the fire and was burned to death. [5]

What Apollonia’s Martyrdom Means In the Context of Women’s Ordination — Martyrs Were Recognised to Have ‘The Power of the Keys’ — The Power to Forgive Sins — This is the job of a priest and women martyrs like Apollonia were included in it.

Throughout the Church’s history, there have been many women and men who witnessed to their Christian faith unto death. Martyrdom does not distinguish biology.

According to the Church’s tradition, anyone — woman or man — on the way to martyrdom had the power to forgive sins. This is a function of priesthood. The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus (3rd cent) also says that any confessor who had been imprisoned for faith automatically attains the rank of presbyter (priest) in the Roman communities. [6]

The martyr St. Catherine of Alexandria is shown to have the ‘power of the keys’ — the power to forgive sins — by virtue of her journey to martyrdom. In this engraving by Albrecht Dührer, the rack reminds us of her torture, the throne and sword of ho…

The martyr St. Catherine of Alexandria is shown to have the ‘power of the keys’ — the power to forgive sins — by virtue of her journey to martyrdom. In this engraving by Albrecht Dührer, the rack reminds us of her torture, the throne and sword of how she reigns with Christ.

Saints Irenaeus (2nd cent) and Cyprian (3rd cent) applies this power of martyrdom equally to female and male confessors. It underlines that in the early Church, women, just as men, shared in the ‘power of the keys’ — binding and loosening on behalf of Christ. The martyr St. Catherine of Alexandria is shown to have power in the engraving by Albrecht Dührer. The engraving includes a set of keys referencing ‘the power of the keys’. (see left).

Apollonia as Woman Deacon

Gary Macy's book, The Hidden History of Women's Ordination: Female Clergy in the Medieval West, and Kyriaki Karidoyanes Fitzgerald's book, Women Deacons in the Orthodox Church: Called to Holiness and Ministry both provide information about women’s ministry in the early Church. This is an era of Church history that has been diminished, suppressed, and nearly forgotten.

Restoration of the ordained women’s diaconate was recently considered at the Vatican’s Synod on the Amazon. From the final document, we know that the question has been tabled for further study:

"103. In the many consultations carried out in the Amazon, the fundamental role of religious and lay women in the Church of the Amazon and its communities was recognized and emphasized, given the wealth of services they provide. In a large number of these consultations, the permanent diaconate for women was requested. This made it an important theme during the Synod. The Study Commission on the Diaconate of Women which Pope Francis created in 2016 has already arrived as a Commission at partial findings regarding the reality of the diaconate of women in the early centuries of the Church and its implications for today. We would therefore like to share our experiences and reflections with the Commission and we await its results."

Tens of thousands of women served as fully ordained deacons in Catholic parishes during ten long centuries. Some of them ministered in Italy and Gaul, but the vast majority lived and worked in Greece, Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. At that time the Orthodox East was still part of the Catholic Church. Learn more about them through the work of our member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research here: The Ancient Deaconesses — Women Who Were Ordained Deacons

Women’s Ordination Worldwide’s position paper on restoration of the ordained women’s diaconate is here: WOW Supports Restoration of the Ordained Women’s Diaconate

_____________________________
prepared by -Therese Koturbash, Women’s Ordination Worldwide Communications Team
-Therese Koturbash, BA, LLB, GDCL served as Canadian Delegate to Women’s Ordination Worldwide from 2008 to 2013. For all five of those years, she was elected member of WOW's four person International Leadership Circle. She has also been the National Coordinator of Canada's Catholic Network for Women's Equality. Today, Therese serves on WOW’s Communications Team and is a volunteer with WOW member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research. Her paid work is as a family attorney.

Footnotes

  1. Belote, Olivia, Being Seen: An Art Historical and Statistical Analysis of Feminized Worship , DigitalCommons@Macalaster College, April 4, 2011, p 26.

  2. Saint Apollonia, wikipedia, February 9, 2020.

  3. In an early discrimination against women, Dionysius created a rule for his local dioces ethat forbade women who had their periods to approach the altar, receive holy communion or even enter a church. "Let them pray elsewhere". See womenpriests.org, Timeline of Women 200-300 AD. Viewing women to be ritually unclean during menstruation is one of three historical reasons women came to be excluded from priesthood. The other two reasons? Women’s supposed inferiority to men and women being the source of sin (Eve). Women’s exclusion from priesthood rests on social prejudice and not scripture, theology or tradition.

  4. Long extracts of the letter have been preserved in Eusebius' Historia Ecclesiae.

  5. op cit., wikipedia.

  6. Wijngaards, John, Women Martyrs, www.womenpriests.org

  7. Harney, Eileen Marie, An Art Historical and Statistical Analysis of Feminized Worship, a thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. Graduate Department of Medieval Studies University of Toronto, p 13

Abbesses

Abbesses

abbess.jpg

Whatever the restrictions on female monasticism were at any particular time, the actual lifestyle of a particular convent was determined to a large extent by the abbess. In many instances, she had as much power as her male counterpart. Despite the church’s best efforts to put tight reins on nunneries, the abbess often ruled her community according to her own prescribed standards. This was possible because ‘monasticism from its very beginning… lay outside the established order of the Church.’ It was this factor, more than any other that allowed women a meaningful place in the religious life of the Middle Ages. Susan Bell maintains that ‘nuns could and did achieve complete equality with men in the Middle Ages, particularly between the 6th and 12th centuries.’

Whether there was actual complete equality between the sexes in monasticism is a matter for debate but certainly monasticism offered women a place of prominence that could not be found elsewhere in the Church. Indeed, in rare instances, abbesses wielded power comparable to that of the local bishop. Lioba’s mentor, Mother Tetta, for example was said to be ‘so powerful in her ability to lead her community that no man dared enter into her monastery; even bishops were forbidden.’ The power of the abbess was reinforced by the religious symbolism that was and is so pervasive in Catholicism. ‘Like the bishops and abbots, they wore the mitre and cross and carried the staff.’ During the installation service of the abbess of St. Cecilia in Cologne, ‘each member of the clergy under her jurisdiction passed before her, prostrating himself, and kissing her hand.’ The abbess of Las Huelgas in Spain served as ‘dame, superior, prelate, legitimate administrator, spiritual and temporal,’ not only of her own monastery but also of the ‘convents, churches, and hermitages’ under her jurisdiction. Even if she did not wield ecclesiastical power, it was common for the head of the convent to act as a business administrator with wide ranging duties closely tied to the local economy and politics. This is illustrated in Chaucer’s Tales. Here, the prioress is a ‘woman of proud breeding, and large responsibilities administering a spacious domain as the source of her convent’s revenues.’

The position of abbess was the highest to which a woman could attain. It was clearly above that of prioress — women who also ruled convents but were subject to an abbot. The abbess not only ruled a large community of nuns (and frequently monks as well), but also had jurisdiction over vast territories that included villages and towns. And this jurisdiction in a number of instances did not involve merely civil matters. According to Joan Morris, ‘the abbess of a religious order was an ordained person even though those who were under her were not so’, and ‘they were exempt from jurisdiction of a bishop and directly dependent on the Holy See.’ Morris argues in her book, The Lady Was A Bishop, that the long history of women with clerical ordination has been purposely hidden in an effort to hold women back.

- Daughters of the Church: Women and ministry from New Testament times to the present, by Ruth A. Tucker and Walter L. Liefield, Zondervan 1987 pp 143-145

Thomas Aquinas and Women's Ordination by Therese Koturbash

Blockbuster theologian, saint and Doctor of the Roman Catholic Church, Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) is important to the case for women's ordination.

Historically, there are three 'reasons' for exclusion of women from priesthood:

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) … important to know in the case for women’s ordination

Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) … important to know in the case for women’s ordination

  1. women were considered to be the source of sin (Eve);

  2. women were considered to be unclean at certain times (menstruation, child birth);

  3. women were considered inferior to men in every way. Sidebar: Until fairly recently, even scientists held the view that women were inferior to men!

This Is Where Thomas Comes In

This is where Thomas comes in.

Thomas Aquinas was the most influential Catholic theologian of the Middle Ages. An Italian Dominican philosopher and theologian, he was a prolific writer who combined theological principles of faith with the philosophical principles of reason. He is considered an authority of the Roman Catholic Church.

During his time, women were excluded from priestly ministry. Thomas’s nature compelled him to find a justification for this. He determined that the main reason was women’s inferior nature. He based his findings on what he read in Aristotle's work which was was well known and popular in Europe at the time.

Like Aristotle, Thomas believed that only the male seed carried life. Following this assessment, he then judged that women have less intelligence than men and are weaker in character. than men.

Thomas And Women:

This caused Thomas to rationalise things like this:

In the 17th century, many researchers believed each spermatozoa contained a tiny, completely pre-formed human within it, as illustrated in this 1695 sketch by Nicolaas Hartsoeker. (Wikimedia Commons)

In the 17th century, many researchers believed each spermatozoa contained a tiny, completely pre-formed human within it, as illustrated in this 1695 sketch by Nicolaas Hartsoeker. (Wikimedia Commons)

We want to note that Women’s Ordination Worldwide has tremendous respect for Thomas Aquinas and his scholarship. However, had he the benefit of modern science, it is unlikely he would have arrived at the conclusions about women and justifications for their exclusion from priesthood that he did.

WOW is indebted to the work of Dr. John Wijngaards, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research and their website, womenpriests.org. For their page on Thomas, see here: Thomas Aquinas

This page prepared for WOW by
Therese Koturbash: Therese Koturbash, BA, LLB, GDCL served as Canadian Delegate to Women’s Ordination Worldwide from 2008 to 2013. For all five of those years, she was elected member of WOW's four person International Leadership Circle. She has also been the National Coordinator of Canada's Catholic Network for Women's Equality. Today, Therese serves on WOW’s Communications Team and is a volunteer with WOW member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research. Her paid work is as a family attorney.

Notes:

  1. Poppick, Laura, The Long, Winding Tale of Sperm Science …and why it’s finally headed in the right direction, Smithsonian Magazine, June 7, 2017.

Rev. Florence Li Tim-Oi -- First Woman Ordained in Anglican Communion 25 January 1944

Reverend Florence Li Tim-Oi

Reverend Florence Li Tim-Oi

Florence Li Tim-Oi (5 May 1907 – 26 February 1992) was the first woman to be ordained to the priesthood in the Anglican Communion. This happened on 25 January 1944 in Macau.

When the Church of England began ordaining women priests in March 1994, few people appreciated that the first Anglican woman priest in the Anglican Communion had been ordained 50 years earlier on January 25, 1944 when Florence Li Tim Oi’s priesthood was recognised by Bishop Ronald Hall in war torn Macao.  Her story bears remarkable similarity to that of Roman Catholic Ludmila Javorova who was clandestinely ordained in Soviet occupied Czechoslovakia’s underground Church by Bishop Felix Davidek in 1970.

Li Tim-Oi was born in the fishing village of Aberbeen, Hong Kong during a time when baby boys were preferred. Her parents, forward looking people, were determined to challenge prejudice against girls. Their chosen name for their child means much beloved daughter.

As a young student, Li Tim-Oi joined the Anglican Church. She chose the name Florence at her baptism after Florence Nightingale, the famous 19th century English nurse who she knew as the Lady of the Lamp.

Li Tim-Oi, her mother, Bishop Mok, her father, Archdeacon Lee Kow Yan after her ordination as Deacon by at St John’s Cathedral Hong Kong, Ascension Day 22 May 1941

Li Tim-Oi, her mother, Bishop Mok, her father, Archdeacon Lee Kow Yan after her ordination as Deacon by at St John’s Cathedral Hong Kong, Ascension Day 22 May 1941

Tim-Oi began studies at Union Theological College in Canton. When she attended the ordination of a woman deacon, the presiding Chinese minister asked, ‘Here is an Englishwoman who is offering herself to serve the Church. Might there also be a Chinese woman who feels called by God to serve as a deacon?’ Tim-Oi prayed and asked, 'God would you like to send me?'

Her prayer was answered. She was ordained a deacon on Ascension Day 1941. She was given charge of an Anglican congregation in the Portuguese colony of Macao which at the time was overflowing with refugees from war-torn China.  Though she was not authorized to celebrate the Eucharist (a priest had to travel from Hong Kong for this) Tim-Oi ministered on a full time basis. She tended to the physical and spiritual needs of her congregation and its neighbors.  She baptized, married and buried faithful.  She gave counsel and friendship to the grieving, organised food for the hungry and kept hope and faith alive among the people desperately struggling during time of war.

Hong Kong Bishop Raymond Hall approached his assignments with a sense of practicality. The Japanese occupation of Hong Kong and of parts of China and World War II made it impossible for Anglican priests to get to neutral Macau. When a priest could no longer travel to Macau to preside at periodic celebrations of the eucharist, Hall asked Tim-Oi to meet him in unoccupied territory in Free China where on 25 January 1944 he ordained her a priest. [1] He knew this was a momentous and controversial step. He knew there would eventually be resistance to her service as a priest. In his mind, he resolved that he was not ordaining Florence Li Tim-Oi but instead merely confirming what he and many others witnessed - that Tim-Oi had the gift of priestly ministry and that she was already ordained by God for this service.  In a letter to the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Temple, Hall explained the extraordinary act he was about to do:

I have three Chinese priests in Hong Kong but they cannot now get permission to go to Macao. Her work has been remarkably successful.  My judgment is that it is only exceptional women who can do this kind of work.  But we are going to have such exceptional women in China and such exceptional need.  Moreover, working as a minister in charge of a congregation, Deaconess Li has developed as a man-pastor develops and has none of that frustrated fussiness that is noticeable in women who having the pastoral charisma are denied full exercise in the ministry of the church. 

Hall continued, ‘I'm not an advocate for the ordination of women. I am, however, determined that no prejudices should prevent the congregations committed to my care having the sacraments of the Church.’ [2] After the war, controversy erupted over her priestly ordination. A woman priest? Tim-Oi was asked to relinquish her priest's license. Concerned for the difficulties her status might cause Bishop Hall, and because she viewed his position to be more more important than her own, she agreed to surrender her license. [3] While she ceased functioning as a priest, she never renounced her Holy Orders. She continued to serve another congregation, this time in Hepu, until the rise of Communism.

Reverend Florence Li Tim-Oi

Reverend Florence Li Tim-Oi

Under Maoist persecution, churches in China were closed. The knowledge of her priesthood carried her through Maoist persecution. The Red Guards made her cut up her vestments with scissors and humiliated her in other ways. She was sent for ‘re-education.’ Along with other victims of China’s Cultural Revolution, she lived in obscurity and hardship for more than 30 years. She entered what she says was a very dark period of her life. She contemplated suicide. Then, she says, she was ‘touched by the Holy Spirit.’ She heard God speak to her and say, ‘Are you a wise woman? You are a priest!’ She knew then that God was with her and would support her always, through all of her adversity. She was sent to work on a farm where part of her assignment was to care for chickens. Her home was raided several times and her possessions taken away. Many years later, she was asked how she sustained her faith during this time, and she answered, ‘I just went up the mountain and nobody knew.’ Eventually she was able to retire from the farm. When the curtain eventually lifted, she was granted permission near the end of her life to leave China.

In 1983, arrangements were made for her to come to Canada where she was appointed as an honorary assistant at St. John's Chinese congregation and St. Matthew's parish in Toronto. The Anglican Church of Canada had by this time approved the ordination of women to the priesthood. In 1984 -- the 40th anniversary of her ordination-- Florence Li Tim-Oi was with great joy and thanksgiving reinstated as a priest. This event was celebrated not only in Canada but also at Westminster Abbey and at Sheffield in England even though the Church of England had not yet approved the ordination of women.

From that date until her death in 1992, she exercised her priesthood with faithfulness and quiet dignity.  She won tremendous respect for herself and increasing support for other women seeking ordination. She was awarded Doctorates of Divinity by General Theological Seminary, New York, and Trinity College, Toronto.

The very quality of Ms. Li's ministry in China and in Canada and the grace with which she exercised her priesthood helped convince many people through the communion and beyond that the Holy Spirit was certainly working in and through women priests. Her contribution to the church far exceeded the expectations of those involved in her ordination in 1944. She continued to serve at the Anglican Cathedral in Toronto for several years before her death in 1992.

She died on 26 February 1992 in Toronto and is buried there.

In 2003, the Episcopal Church fixed 24 January as her feast day in Lesser Feasts and Fasts, based on the eve of the anniversary of her ordination. In 2007, the Anglican Communion celebrated the centennial of her birth. [4] In 2018, she was made a permanent part of the Episcopal Church’s calendar of saints. [5] She is memorialized in the calendar of the Anglican Church of Canada with a feast day on February 26. Her archives are held in the Lusi Wong Library at Renison University College, the Anglican college at the University of Waterloo.

The Li Tim-Oi Foundation has now been set up in her memory and is a charity helping women in the Two-Thirds World train for ministry in their own countries.

- Therese Koturbash
Therese Koturbash, BA, LLB, GDCL served as Canadian Delegate to Women’s Ordination Worldwide from 2008 to 2013. For all five of those years, she was elected member of WOW's four person International Leadership Circle. She has also been the National Coordinator of Canada's Catholic Network for Women's Equality. Today, Therese serves on WOW’s Communications Team and is a volunteer with WOW member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research. Her paid work is as a family attorney.

Notes:

  1. Li, Florence Tim Oi (1996). Raindrops of my Life. Toronto: Anglican Book Centre. pp. 20–21.

  2. Rose, Mavis (1996). Freedom From Sanctified Sexism – Women Transforming the Church. Queensland, Australia: Allira Publications. pp. 129–149.

  3. "Li Tim-Oi's Story". www.ittakesonewoman.org

  4. Schjonberg, Mary Frances (4 May 2007). "Communion to celebrate first woman priest Li Tim-Oi on anniversary of birth | Episcopal Church". The Episcopal Church.

  5.  Frances, Mary. "Convention makes Thurgood Marshall, Pauli Murray, Florence Li Tim-Oi permanent saints of the church – Episcopal News Service". Episcopalnewsservice.org

Sources:

Maria 2.0 - Grassroots Germany: Catholic Women's Movement A Voice for Change

Maria 2.0 is a grassroots German initiative by women committed to change in the Catholic Church. Representing ‘crystallized fury over a male-only priesthood and bishops' foot-dragging on sex scandals,’ [1] Maria 2.0’s work is creative and powerful. The movement has gained commanding attention of the Church in Germany and European Catholic media. This summary aims to provide background about their work since we’ll be following their initiatives regarding Church reforms for women.

One of Maria 2.0’s symbolic pictures is the Virgin Mary with her mouth taped shut …. signifying her silencing and that of women throughout Church history.

One of Maria 2.0’s symbolic pictures is the Virgin Mary with her mouth taped shut …. signifying her silencing and that of women throughout Church history.

In May 2019, Maria 2.0 gained international prominence when it called for a German-wide Church strike for women. Women were encouraged to engage in a one week boycott of official services and their volunteer efforts in churches. Since then, momentum hasn’t stopped. Maria 2.0 has been organising other demonstrations for equal rights for women in the Church. One was the human chain around Cologne Cathedral in September.’ [2]

Maria 2.0 was born in a reading circle in Münster, Germany’s Holy Cross Parish. As the reading circle studied Pope Francis’s apostolic exhortation Evangelii gaudium, the spirit of the movement emerged. Women realised their solidarity in shared frustration around:

  • their exclusion from sacramental ministry on account only of their being women;

  • Church policy on mandatory celibacy ;

  • and the hierarchical fumbling of the sex abuse crisis.

The initiative is named for Jesus’s mother, the Virgin Mary who in German is known as Maria. Throughout Church history, Mary is held up as the Churchman’s ideal for women — silent, submissive, and obedient. This narrow version of a role model is unhelpful to women and is not true to the person of Mary. ‘2.0’ signifies the need for a Church reboot so that positive change can happen. Leader Barbara Stratmann points out: ‘2.0 stands for a new beginning. Reset everything to zero. We are no longer like that.’ [3]

Out of Shared Concern, A Movement is Born

As the movement solidified, members flagged their concerns and plans for action in an open letter to Pope Francis. A translation of it reads:

Open Letter to pope Francis [4]

Holy Father,

We women believe that Jesus of Nazareth announced his liberating message of love to us all — men AND women. We are mourning:

maria2.0 women's organ.png
  • all known and unknown abuse cases of all kind in the Roman Catholic Church;

  • the absence of plausible apologies and aid to those who have suffered from violence;

  • those who no longer believe in the church and its message.

We stand before the shattered remains of our affection and trust in our church with great disappointment, bewilderment and anger. We therefore call upon the Catholic Church, in accordance with many before us:

  • to deny office to those that have harmed others or have tolerated or covered up such wrongdoings;

  • to surrender all offenders to secular courts and to cooperate in all prosecutions without restrictions;

  • to allow women access to all church functions;

  • to abolish mandatory celibacy;

  • to align church sexual morals realistically with the reality of life.

The men of our church like to sing their praise to women. Paradoxically, men are the sole determiners of our participation in our church. As of now, only one woman is tolerated among them: Mary. On her pedestal. She stands there. Reduced to silence.

We want to take Mary off her pedestal and into our midst, as a sister facing our direction. We will act! We will post this letter to all church gates and call all women to action with MARY 2.0 From Saturday, the 11th until Saturday the 18th of May [2019] we will not enter the church and [we will] deny our service to the church. We want to make known how empty the churches will be without us and how much important work will be unfinished without us.

  • We will remain outside!

  • We will celebrate worship together on the church squares, in front of the church gates.

  • We will dance, sing, pray and find new words and expressions.

  • We will welcome all to participate, also men.

  • We will bring white sheets and cover the church squares in the colour of innocence, the colour of grief and compassion. We will use these sheets to paint, write, combine, stain and create with all ideas welcome as a collective. We will surround the church in the colours of new beginnings!

Yours sincerely,

The women and men signing this letter.

Link to the petition

Gospel logic means justice and mercy as the DNA of the Gospel. We want a Church that doesn’t exclude anyone, but invites everyone who sincerely asks about God. For me personally this is the best thing when women come to me… and say that they have not been in the church for 20 years and have found a home again through Maria 2.0. This is evangelisation in the best sense…The important thing for me is that we always keep in mind that God is greater and that the questions that we have can only point to that. We point to Christ. We are not Christ, we can only point to him and what he exemplified for us. For me that is the Gospel and for me that is the logic of why I am committed.

Maria Mesrian, Maria 2.0 Member 5

Church Boycotts

When I grow up, I will become Pope.

At a Church boycott, the image of the Virgin Mary has her mouth taped shut signalling her silencing by the Church hierarchy because she is a woman.

At a Church boycott, the image of the Virgin Mary has her mouth taped shut signalling her silencing by the Church hierarchy because she is a woman.

Founders of the movement invited all German Catholic women to participate in a boycott during the annual May devotions to the Blessed Virgin Mary (in 2019, May 11-18). As promised in their letter to Francis, women held services outside their churches and refrained from all church-related voluntary work. Church squares were covered with white sheets symbolizing charity, sorrow, and a new beginning . The white sheets also served as a canvas for expressing complaints and demands in creative and emphatic ways.

At least 50 locations participated in the boycott and included women and men. A vigil held on the Münsteraner Domplatz gathered 700-800 people.

Participation Outside Germany: Austria, Switzerland, and USA

Women in Austria have joined the movement. Women involved in the church in Switzerland organized their own boycott and also participated in the national women's strike. In Washington, D.C. , women joined forces by hosting an outdoor Mass — Mass On Mass —near the Vatican Embassy. The liturgy was led by two Roman Catholic womenpriests while cold rain fell.

Response to the Boycotts

From German Catholic Women’s Associations

Support came from large established German lay associations including:

  • Katholische Frauengemeinschaft Deutschlands (Kfd) — a large established association of German Catholic women;

  • Katholischer Deutscher Frauenbund (KDFB). - a large established association of German Catholic women. In support of Maria 2.0, KDFB President Maria Flachsbarth said abuse cases and cover-ups by priests were sinking the Church into deep crisis and credibility loss. She pointed out that striking women wanted to show how much the church and its evangelical gospel means to them. Flachsbarth is also a federal parliamentarian and member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democrat (CDU) party. [6]

  • Central Council of German Catholics (ZdK) — Thomas Sternberg, President of the Central Council of German Catholics (ZdK) observed at its lay convention earlier in 2019, that ‘Without the women nothing happens.’ Sternberg predicts that emerging from German Synodal process and the protests of Maria 2.0 will emerge for the Church as a whole an ordained women’s diaconate and married men in priesthood. ‘Never before have I experienced a situation in which indignation extended so far into the core of our churches,’ he said. [7]

From Leading Churchmen in Germany

  • Catholic priests voiced their support;

  • Jörg Hagemann, the Dean of Münster took part in a Liturgy of the Word in front of the church where he later celebrated Eucharist;

  • Franz-Jozef Bode, the Bishop of Osnabrück and head of the German Women’s Commission of the Deutschen Bischofskonferenz, welcomed the initiative, stating that while it is problematic that women left the Eucharistic communion and held their own ceremonies in parishes, one had to recognize that the profound injury to many active women in the church is behind this impatience: they don't feel the approval in the church as their commitment deserves. In endorsing Maria 2.0, Bode said he regretted the boycott but that ‘one must be very perceptive of the impatience of many women in the Catholic Church. Behind it is a very deep wound — that they in the church do not feel accepted in relation to their efforts.’ [8]

  • The Archbishop of Freiburg, Stepan Burger expressed sympathy women's denial of access to the ordained diaconate and priesthood;

  • Matthias Kopp, spokesperson for the German Conference of Catholic Bishops recognised the need for change and discussion but said that boycotts and strikes were not an acceptable approach in the work for change;

  • Archbishop Georg Gänswein, personal secretary to the former Pope Benedict XVI (both Gänswein and the former Pope are now based in Rome but come from Germany) criticized the movement for risking the creation of a new church by tinkering around with the Church’s DNA.

Other responses

  • The Conservative Forum of German Catholics called for KDFB members who were "committed to the teaching of the Catholic Church" to depart the organization;

  • The Catholic Johanna Stöhr from the diocese of Augsburg responded by founding a counter-initiative Mary 1.0 in order to show, as she said, that there are also women who are faithful to the teachings of the church.’ Her slogan is, Mary doesn't need an update.;

  • Peter Winnemöller said that self invented services did not satisfy the Sunday obligation and that the boycott did not meet the requirements of a dispensation, therefore making the participants guilty of a mortal sin.

Unsurprised by some of the negative reactions coming from women like Johanna Stöhr, Münster's Holy Cross parish priest Stefan Jürgens observed, ‘That's what I have experienced in the 25 years I've been in the ministry: the fiercest opponents of priesthood for women are among women! They are just accustomed because of their upbringing that they are the ones serving; that they're rather subordinate themselves. But the young women can't stand it anymore.’ [9]

Maria 2.0 Website

Maria 2.0 Facebook Page

— contribution by Therese Koturbash, WOW Communications Team
Therese Koturbash, BA, LLB, GDCL served as Canadian Delegate to Women’s Ordination Worldwide from 2008 to 2013. For all five of those years, she was elected member of WOW's four person International Leadership Circle. She has also been the National Coordinator of Canada's Catholic Network for Women's Equality. Today, Therese serves on WOW’s Communications Team and is a volunteer with WOW member group, Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research. Her paid work is as a family attorney.

Notes

  1. German Catholic women begin boycott over lack of reforms, dw.com, 2019-05-11.

  2. Mada Jurado, German Church women’s rights movement still striving for “equality and renewal”: member, Novena News, January 21, 2020.

  3. "Die Zeit der schweigenden Frauchen ist vorbei". Deutschlandfunk (in German). 2019-05-10.

  4. "Open Letter to pope Francis" (PDF). Maria 2.0.

  5. op cit, Mada Jurado.

  6. op cit, German Catholic women

  7. ibid.

  8. ibid.

  9. ibid.